White Barbara Prudhomme, Mulligan Shelley E
117 Hewitt Hall, 4 Library Way, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA.
Am J Occup Ther. 2005 Jul-Aug;59(4):426-36. doi: 10.5014/ajot.59.4.426.
To compare performance on the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), a measure of functional task performance and physiological responses (salivary cortisol levels) during AMPS administration, between typically developing children and children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
In this quasi-experimental study, independent t tests, and mixed, repeated measures analysis of variance were conducted to compare a group of typically developing children (n = 21) with a group of children with ADHD (n = 12) on two dependent measures: (a) the AMPS and (b) salivary cortisol. Salivary cortisol, a stress hormone, was taken at three time points, baseline, mid-way through AMPS administration, and 20 min following AMPS administration.
Significant differences were found on the activities of daily living (ADL) process ability measure of the AMPS (p = .001) and the ADL motor ability measure (p = .04), with the ADHD group performing more poorly than typical children. There was no significant group (ADHD vs. control) by time period interaction effect on cortisol levels. Overall, the cortisol levels of the ADHD group were higher than the levels of those in the control group (p = .02). Cortisol levels tended to drop significantly over time (p = .01) for both groups, however the patterns differed somewhat between groups. Cortisol levels of the typical children dropped at the final time period (20 min post-AMPS administration) whereas the levels of the children in the ADHD remained higher during this time period. This interaction effect approached, but did not reach, statistical significance (p = .15).
The results of this investigation suggest that the AMPS is sensitive to detecting functional performance concerns, and both motor and process skill deficits, associated with ADHD, and therefore may be a useful assessment tool with this population. Data also suggests that cortisol expression to a well-known ADL task may be lower if the task is not overly challenging for the individual, and provides support for further study of the role of cortisol with disorders of attention.
比较发育正常儿童与被诊断为注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童在运动与过程技能评估(AMPS)中的表现,AMPS是一种用于衡量功能性任务表现以及在AMPS测试过程中的生理反应(唾液皮质醇水平)的方法。
在这项准实验研究中,采用独立样本t检验以及混合重复测量方差分析,以比较一组发育正常儿童(n = 21)和一组ADHD儿童(n = 12)在两项因变量指标上的差异:(a)AMPS;(b)唾液皮质醇。唾液皮质醇是一种应激激素,在三个时间点采集:基线、AMPS测试进行到一半时以及AMPS测试结束后20分钟。
在AMPS的日常生活活动(ADL)过程能力测量指标上发现了显著差异(p = .001),在ADL运动能力测量指标上也有显著差异(p = .04),ADHD组的表现比正常儿童差。在皮质醇水平上,没有发现显著的组(ADHD组与对照组)×时间段交互效应。总体而言,ADHD组的皮质醇水平高于对照组(p = .02)。两组的皮质醇水平均随时间显著下降(p = .01),然而两组的下降模式略有不同。发育正常儿童的皮质醇水平在最后一个时间段(AMPS测试结束后20分钟)下降,而ADHD儿童在此时间段内的皮质醇水平仍然较高。这种交互效应接近但未达到统计学显著性(p = .15)。
本研究结果表明,AMPS对于检测与ADHD相关的功能表现问题以及运动和过程技能缺陷很敏感,因此可能是针对该人群的一种有用的评估工具。数据还表明,如果任务对个体而言不过于具有挑战性,那么唾液皮质醇对一项众所周知的ADL任务的反应可能会更低,这为进一步研究皮质醇在注意力障碍中的作用提供了支持。