Suppr超能文献

对2005年7月7日伦敦爆炸事件的心理和行为反应:对伦敦人代表性样本的横断面调查

Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners.

作者信息

Rubin G James, Brewin Chris R, Greenberg Neil, Simpson John, Wessely Simon

机构信息

King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre (PO62), London SE5 9RJ.

出版信息

BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38583.728484.3A. Epub 2005 Aug 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of the bombings in London on 7 July on stress levels and travel intentions in London's population.

DESIGN

A cross sectional telephone survey using random digit dialling was conducted to contact a representative sample of adults. Respondents were asked to participate in an interview enquiring about current levels of stress and travel intentions.

SETTING

Interviews took place between 18 and 20 July.

PARTICIPANTS

1010 participants (10% of the eligible people we contacted) completed the interviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcomes were presence of substantial stress, measured by using an identical tool to that used to assess the emotional impact of 11 September 2001 in the US population, and intention to travel less on tubes, trains, and buses, or into central London, once the transport network had returned to normal.

RESULTS

31% of Londoners reported substantial stress and 32% reported an intention to travel less. Among other things, having difficulty contacting friends or family by mobile phone (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.7), having thought you could have been injured or killed (3.8, 2.4 to 6.2), and being Muslim (4.0, 2.5 to 6.6) were associated with a greater presence of substantial stress, whereas being white (0.3, 0.2 to 0.4) and having previous experience of terrorism (0.6, 0.5 to 0.9) were associated with reduced stress. Only 12 participants (1%) felt that they needed professional help to deal with their emotional response to the attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the psychological needs of those intimately caught up in the attacks will require further assessment, we found no evidence of a widespread desire for professional counselling. The attacks have inflicted disproportionately high levels of distress among non-white and Muslim Londoners.

摘要

目的

评估7月7日伦敦爆炸事件对伦敦居民压力水平和出行意愿的影响。

设计

采用随机数字拨号进行横断面电话调查,以联系具有代表性的成年人样本。受访者被要求参与一项访谈,询问当前的压力水平和出行意愿。

地点

访谈于7月18日至20日进行。

参与者

1010名参与者(占我们联系的符合条件人群的10%)完成了访谈。

主要观察指标

主要结果是存在严重压力,通过使用与评估2001年9月11日美国民众情绪影响时相同的工具来衡量,以及一旦交通网络恢复正常,减少乘坐地铁、火车和公交车或前往伦敦市中心出行的意愿。

结果

31%的伦敦人报告有严重压力,32%的人报告有减少出行的意愿。除此之外,通过手机难以联系到朋友或家人(优势比1.7,95%置信区间1.1至2.7)、认为自己可能受伤或死亡(3.8,2.4至6.2)以及是穆斯林(4.0,2.5至6.6)与更高程度的严重压力相关,而白人(0.3,0.2至0.4)和有过恐怖主义经历(0.6,0.5至0.9)与压力减轻相关。只有12名参与者(1%)觉得他们需要专业帮助来应对对袭击的情绪反应。

结论

尽管那些直接受袭击影响的人的心理需求需要进一步评估,但我们没有发现广泛渴望专业咨询的证据。这些袭击给非白人和穆斯林伦敦人带来了过高的痛苦。

相似文献

3
Are Londoners prepared for an emergency? A longitudinal study following the London bombings.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2008 Dec;6(4):309-19. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2008.0043.
4
Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11.
JAMA. 2002 Sep 11;288(10):1235-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.10.1235.
6
Psychological impact upon London Ambulance Service of the 2005 bombings.
Occup Med (Lond). 2009 Sep;59(6):428-33. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp100. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
8
Long-term health and wellbeing of people affected by the 2002 Bali bombing.
Med J Aust. 2013 Mar 18;198(5):273-7. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11480.
10
Physical health of members of the public who experienced terrorist bombings in London on 07 july 2005.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):139-44. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00007871.

引用本文的文献

1
Compliance with measures among actors and lessons learnt in the management of COVID-19 institutional quarantine in Uganda.
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 17;10(2):e24841. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24841. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
2
The short-term impact of terrorism on public mental health: an emergency primary care approach.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):2325. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17240-z.
3
Assessing the relationship between terrorist attacks against ingroup or outgroup members and public support for terrorism.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:778714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778714. eCollection 2022.
7
Mental Health Status among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Iran.
Iran J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;16(3):362-369. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v16i3.6263.
10
Understanding the Motives for Terrorism-Does it Have an Effect on Psychological Reactions? A Replication and Extension.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15750-NP15773. doi: 10.1177/08862605211025045. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Common mental disorders and ethnicity in England: the EMPIRIC study.
Psychol Med. 2004 Nov;34(8):1543-51. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002715.
2
Acute stress disorder, alcohol use, and perception of safety among hospital staff after the sniper attacks.
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Oct;54(10):1383-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1383.
4
A systematic review of single-session psychological interventions ('debriefing') following trauma.
Psychother Psychosom. 2003 Jul-Aug;72(4):176-84. doi: 10.1159/000070781.
5
The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults living in institutions.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Feb-May;15(1-2):129-33. doi: 10.1080/0954026021000046047.
6
Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11.
JAMA. 2002 Sep 11;288(10):1235-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.10.1235.
8
Post-traumatic stress disorder.
N Engl J Med. 2002 May 9;346(19):1495-8; author reply 1495-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200205093461913.
9
A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1507-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200111153452024.
10
Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing.
JAMA. 1999 Aug 25;282(8):755-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.8.755.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验