Suppr超能文献

长期机械通气及撤机的计算机驱动管理:一项初步研究。

Computer-driven management of prolonged mechanical ventilation and weaning: a pilot study.

作者信息

Bouadma Lila, Lellouche François, Cabello Belen, Taillé Solenne, Mancebo Jordi, Dojat Michel, Brochard Laurent

机构信息

Medical and Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, 51 av. du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1446-50. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2766-2. Epub 2005 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of a computer-driven system (CDS) to manage pressure-support ventilation over prolonged periods and to predict weaning readiness compared to intensivists. The system continuously adapts pressure support, gradually decreases ventilatory assistance when possible, and indicates weaning readiness.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A two-center, prospective, open, clinical, pilot study in medical ICUs of two university hospitals.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

42 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients (60+/-14 years, SAPS II 39+/-15), 9 of whom were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

As soon as patients could tolerate pressure support, they were ventilated with the CDS. The times of weaning readiness determined by the intensivists and CDS were compared.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Weaning was successful in 25 patients and failed in 7; unplanned extubation occurred in 1 patient. Time on CDS ventilation was 3+/-3 days (maximum, 12 days). The CDS detected weaning readiness earlier than the intensivists in 17 patients, and intensivists earlier than the CDS in 4; in 11 patients detection times coincided.

CONCLUSIONS

A CDS was successful in fully managing pressure-support ventilation over prolonged periods and often proposed weaning readiness earlier than the intensivists did. Use of this CDS may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation.

摘要

目的

评估计算机驱动系统(CDS)长期管理压力支持通气的能力,并与重症监护医生相比,预测撤机准备情况。该系统可持续调整压力支持,尽可能逐渐减少通气辅助,并提示撤机准备情况。

设计与背景

在两家大学医院的医学重症监护病房进行的一项双中心、前瞻性、开放性临床试点研究。

患者与参与者

42例连续接受机械通气的患者(60±14岁,简化急性生理学评分II 39±15),其中9例被排除。

干预措施

患者一旦能够耐受压力支持,即使用CDS进行通气。比较重症监护医生和CDS确定的撤机准备时间。

测量与结果

25例患者撤机成功,7例失败;1例患者发生非计划拔管。使用CDS通气的时间为3±3天(最长12天)。CDS比重症监护医生更早检测到17例患者的撤机准备情况,重症监护医生比CDS更早检测到4例;11例患者的检测时间一致。

结论

CDS成功地长期全面管理压力支持通气,且通常比重症监护医生更早提示撤机准备情况。使用该CDS可能会缩短机械通气时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验