Krieg Edward F, Chrislip David W, Crespo Carlos J, Brightwell W Stephen, Ehrenberg Richard L, Otto David A
Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2005 May-Jun;120(3):240-51. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000305.
The goals of this study were two-fold: (1) to assess the relationship between blood lead levels and neurobehavioral test performance in a nationally sample of adults from the third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey and (2) to analyze the results from previously published studies of occupational lead exposure that used the same neurobehavioral tests as those included in the survey.
Regression models were used to test and estimate the relationships between measurements of blood lead and performance on a simple reaction time, a symbol-digit substitution, and a serial digit learning test in adults aged 20-59 years who participated the survey. Mixed models were used to analyze the data from the occupational studies.
The blood lead levels of those participating in the survey ranged from 0.7 to 41.8 microg/dl. The estimated geometric mean was 2.51 microg/dl, and the estimated arithmetic mean was 3.30 microg/dl. In the survey, no statistically significant relationships were found between blood lead concentration and performance on the three neurobehavioral tests when adjusted for covariates. In the occupational studies, the groups exposed to lead consistently performed worse than control groups on the simple reaction time and digit-symbol substitution tests.
The results from the survey and the occupational studies do not provide evidence for impairment of neurobehavioral test performance at levels below 25 microg/dl, the concentration that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention define as elevated in adults. The average blood lead level of the exposed groups in the occupational studies was 41.07 microg/dl, less than 50 microg/dl, the minimum concentration that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires for medical removal from the workplace. Given the evidence of impaired neurobehavioral performance in these groups, the 50 microg/dl limit should be reevaluated.
本研究有两个目标:(1)在第三次全国健康与营养检查调查的全国成年人样本中,评估血铅水平与神经行为测试表现之间的关系;(2)分析先前发表的使用与该调查相同神经行为测试的职业性铅暴露研究结果。
回归模型用于测试和估计参与调查的20 - 59岁成年人血铅测量值与简单反应时间、符号数字替换和系列数字学习测试表现之间的关系。混合模型用于分析职业研究的数据。
参与调查者的血铅水平范围为0.7至41.8微克/分升。估计几何平均数为2.51微克/分升,估计算术平均数为3.30微克/分升。在该调查中,调整协变量后,未发现血铅浓度与三项神经行为测试表现之间存在统计学显著关系。在职业研究中,接触铅的组在简单反应时间和数字符号替换测试中的表现始终比对照组差。
该调查和职业研究的结果未提供证据表明血铅水平低于25微克/分升(疾病控制与预防中心定义的成年人血铅升高浓度)时会损害神经行为测试表现。职业研究中暴露组的平均血铅水平为41.07微克/分升,低于职业安全与健康管理局要求的从工作场所进行医学调离的最低浓度50微克/分升。鉴于这些组中存在神经行为表现受损的证据,50微克/分升的限值应重新评估。