Murray J F
J Pers Assess. 1992 Jun;58(3):494-505. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5803_5.
Much Rorschach research on case material focuses on the utility of a single scoring system, set of variables, or scale in isolation from other systems, scales, or perspectives. This approach fails to acknowledge the complexity of the Rorschach and to reflect the manner in which sophisticated clinicians select and synthesize various perspectives during the clinical inference and decision-making process. A case of a psychotic child is presented to illustrate the utility of a synthetic approach to the Rorschach. The strengths and weaknesses of various Rorschach perspectives in addressing specific diagnostic issues is explored through the case material.
许多关于罗夏墨迹测验个案材料的研究都聚焦于单一评分系统、变量集或量表的效用，而这些都是与其他系统、量表或视角孤立开来的。这种方法没有认识到罗夏墨迹测验的复杂性，也没有反映出经验丰富的临床医生在临床推理和决策过程中选择和综合各种视角的方式。本文呈现了一个患有精神病的儿童案例，以说明对罗夏墨迹测验采用综合方法的效用。通过该案例材料，探讨了罗夏墨迹测验各种视角在解决特定诊断问题时的优缺点。
