Spirrison C L
Mississippi State University.
J Pers Assess. 1992 Jun;58(3):525-36. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5803_8.
Form E of the Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire (16PF-E) was administered to 70 adults (45 men and 25 women) who resided in a public facility for mentally retarded persons. Alpha coefficients were computed for each of 16 primary trait scales. The Intelligence (B), Ego Strength (C), Dominance (E), Superego Strength (G), Parmia (H), Protension (L), Autia (M), Shrewdness (N), Guilt Proneness (O), and Self-Sentiment (Q3) scales exhibited low internal consistency, whereas Premsia (I) and Self-Sufficiency (Q2) evidence relatively higher levels. Personality traits of subjects were also assessed by staff ratings. Ratings were compared to 16PF-E primary and secondary trait scores via correlation coefficients. Results provided virtually no support for the validity of the 16PF-E primary scales and the Exvia, Anxiety, and Cortertia secondary factors as applied to the subject population. Limited support for the validity of the Independence secondary factor was found.
对居住在一所智障人士公共机构中的70名成年人(45名男性和25名女性)施测了十六种人格因素问卷(16PF-E)的E式。计算了16个主要特质量表中每个量表的阿尔法系数。智力(B)、自我力量(C)、支配性(E)、超我力量(G)、偏执(H)、紧张性(L)、自恃性(M)、世故性(N)、内疚倾向(O)和自我情绪性(Q3)量表显示出较低的内部一致性,而敏感性(I)和自主性(Q2)显示出相对较高的水平。工作人员评分也对受试者的人格特质进行了评估。通过相关系数将评分与16PF-E的主要和次要特质分数进行比较。结果几乎没有为16PF-E主要量表以及应用于该受试者群体的外向性、焦虑性和自律性次要因素的有效性提供支持。发现对独立性次要因素的有效性有有限的支持。