明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版（MCMI-II）与卡特尔16种人格因素问卷（16PF）效度量表的比较。

Comparison of MCMI-II and 16PF validity scales.

作者信息

Grossman L S, Craig R J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago 60612-7327, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):384-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_17.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_17

PMID:7722863

Abstract

We administered the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II; Millon, 1987) and the Sixteen Personality Factors Inventory (16PF; Cattell, Eber, & Tatsuoka, 1970) to 131 outpatients in marital therapy and tested the correlation between the validity scales of the two instruments. The results indicated that MCMI-II Disclosure and Debasement scales were positively correlated with the 16PF Fake-Bad scale and negatively correlated with the 16PF Fake-Good scale. The MCMI-II Desirability scale was significantly correlated with the 16PF Fake-Good scale.

摘要

我们对131名接受婚姻治疗的门诊患者施测了米隆临床多轴问卷第二版（MCMI-II；米隆，1987）和卡特尔十六种人格因素问卷（16PF；卡特尔、埃伯和龙冈，1970），并检验了这两种工具效度量表之间的相关性。结果表明，MCMI-II的表露和贬低量表与16PF的假坏量表呈正相关，与16PF的假好量表呈负相关。MCMI-II的期望量表与16PF的假好量表显著相关。