• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版(MCMI-II)与卡特尔16种人格因素问卷(16PF)效度量表的比较。

Comparison of MCMI-II and 16PF validity scales.

作者信息

Grossman L S, Craig R J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago 60612-7327, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):384-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_17.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_17
PMID:7722863
Abstract

We administered the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II; Millon, 1987) and the Sixteen Personality Factors Inventory (16PF; Cattell, Eber, & Tatsuoka, 1970) to 131 outpatients in marital therapy and tested the correlation between the validity scales of the two instruments. The results indicated that MCMI-II Disclosure and Debasement scales were positively correlated with the 16PF Fake-Bad scale and negatively correlated with the 16PF Fake-Good scale. The MCMI-II Desirability scale was significantly correlated with the 16PF Fake-Good scale.

摘要

我们对131名接受婚姻治疗的门诊患者施测了米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II;米隆,1987)和卡特尔十六种人格因素问卷(16PF;卡特尔、埃伯和龙冈,1970),并检验了这两种工具效度量表之间的相关性。结果表明,MCMI-II的表露和贬低量表与16PF的假坏量表呈正相关,与16PF的假好量表呈负相关。MCMI-II的期望量表与16PF的假好量表显著相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of MCMI-II and 16PF validity scales.明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版(MCMI-II)与卡特尔16种人格因素问卷(16PF)效度量表的比较。
J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):384-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_17.
2
MCMI-II report style and bias: profile and validity scales analyses.米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)报告风格与偏差:剖析与效度量表分析
J Pers Assess. 1991 Jun;56(3):466-77. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5603_8.
3
MCMI-III diagnostic validity: bad test or bad validity study.米隆临床多轴问卷第三版(MCMI-III)的诊断效度:是测试不佳还是效度研究不佳。
J Pers Assess. 1996 Apr;66(2):431-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_19.
4
Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications.明尼苏达多项人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)与米隆临床多轴问卷-Ⅱ(MCMI-Ⅱ)人格障碍分类的比较效度
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):569-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7.
5
The evaluation of truthfulness in alleged sex offenders' self-reports: 16PF and MMPI validity scales.对被指控性犯罪者自我报告中真实性的评估:16种人格因素问卷(16PF)和明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)效度量表
J Pers Assess. 1992 Oct;59(2):264-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5902_4.
6
The relationship between the MCMI personality scales and DSM-III, axis II.米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)人格量表与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)轴II之间的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):698-707. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674105.
7
The MMPI and the MCMI in the evaluation of narcissism in a clinical sample.在临床样本中使用明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)和米隆临床多轴量表(MCMI)评估自恋
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):239-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_3.
8
Correspondence of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II in male substance abusers.男性药物滥用者中明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2)与米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI - II)的相关性
J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):390-3. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_18.
9
The detection of fake-bad and fake-good responding on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III.明尼苏达多项人格调查表第三版中假坏与假好反应的检测
Psychol Assess. 2000 Dec;12(4):418-24.
10
The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings.五因素模型及其在临床环境中的评估。
J Pers Assess. 1991 Dec;57(3):399-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5703_2.