Stephens Devalle Julie M
Veterinary Medicine Division, United States Army Medical Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2005 Sep;44(5):35-8.
The purpose of this experiment was to assess the practicality, ease, and reliability of using tympanic, transponder, and noncontact infrared laser thermometry versus rectal thermometry in strain 13 guinea pigs. Body temperatures were measured by all four methods within each animal over 10 min, and three sets of measurements were taken over 2 days. Each method was compared for agreement over time and agreement with the rectal temperature of each animal. Over time the transponder temperatures were the most reliable and had the closest agreement with the rectal temperatures. There was an overall difference in mean temperatures among methods but not between times, indicating that the guinea pigs had stable body temperatures over different time periods. Although the mean temperatures from the transponder and tympanic thermometers were not significantly different from the rectal temperatures, only the transponder method was in close agreement with the rectal method. The tympanic and noncontact infrared laser methods had poor agreement with the rectal method. These study results suggest that transponder thermometry is an easy and accurate alternative to rectal thermometry in strain 13 guinea pigs.
本实验的目的是评估在13号品系豚鼠中,使用鼓膜体温计、应答器体温计和非接触式红外激光体温计与直肠体温计相比的实用性、简易性和可靠性。在每只动物体内,用这四种方法在10分钟内测量体温,并在2天内进行三组测量。比较每种方法随时间的一致性以及与每只动物直肠温度的一致性。随着时间推移,应答器体温计测量的温度最可靠,且与直肠温度最接近。不同方法之间的平均温度存在总体差异,但不同时间之间没有差异,这表明豚鼠在不同时间段体温稳定。虽然应答器体温计和鼓膜体温计测量的平均温度与直肠温度没有显著差异,但只有应答器体温计测量方法与直肠测量方法高度一致。鼓膜体温计和非接触式红外激光体温计测量方法与直肠测量方法的一致性较差。这些研究结果表明,在13号品系豚鼠中,应答器体温计测量是一种替代直肠体温计测量的简易且准确的方法。