Chen Patty H, White Charles E
Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2006 Jan;45(1):57-63.
This study compared rabbit rectal thermometry with 4 other thermometry techniques: an implantable microchip temperature transponder, an environmental noncontact infrared thermometer, a tympanic infrared thermometer designed for use on humans, and a tympanic infrared thermometer designed for use on animals. The microchip transponder was implanted between the shoulder blades; the environmental noncontact infrared thermometer recorded results from the base of the right pinna and the left inner thigh, and the tympanic infrared thermometer temperatures were taken from the right ear. Results from each technique were compared to determine agreement between the test modality and the rectal temperature. The practicality and reliability of the modalities were reviewed also. According to this study, the implantable microchip transponder measurements agreed most closely with the rectal temperature.
本研究将兔直肠测温法与其他4种测温技术进行了比较：一种可植入式微芯片温度应答器、一种环境非接触式红外温度计、一种专为人类设计的鼓膜式红外温度计以及一种专为动物设计的鼓膜式红外温度计。微芯片应答器植入肩胛骨之间；环境非接触式红外温度计记录右耳廓基部和左大腿内侧的测量结果，鼓膜式红外温度计测量右耳温度。比较了每种技术的结果，以确定测试方式与直肠温度之间的一致性。还评估了这些方式的实用性和可靠性。根据本研究，可植入式微芯片应答器的测量结果与直肠温度最为接近。
