Suppr超能文献

阿芬太尼与氯胺酮联合丙泊酚用于纤维支气管镜检查患者自控镇静的比较。

Comparison of alfetanil and ketamine in combination with propofol for patient-controlled sedation during fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

作者信息

Hwang J, Jeon Y, Park H-P, Lim Y-J, Oh Y-S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, South Korea.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Oct;49(9):1334-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00842.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During fiberoptic bronchoscopy, propofol, ketamine, benzodiazepines, and opiates are most commonly used, alone or in combination for sedation. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of propofol/ketamine with propofol/alfentanil for patient-controlled sedation (PCS) during fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

METHOD

Patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either propofol/alfentanil (PA group; n = 138) or propofol/ketamine (PK group; n = 138) via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device for sedation and analgesia. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation were monitored. Degree of patient and bronchoscopist satisfaction was evaluated using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = extremely uncomfortable to 10 = extremely comfortable).

RESULTS

After sedation, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) decreased in the PA group, but SAP was stable in the PK group. Compared with values immediately before starting bronchoscopy, SAP and HR increased during the procedure in both groups (P < 0.05). Patients in the PK group showed more satisfaction [(9.5 (6-10) vs. 9.0 (6-10)), P < 0.05] and amnesia (82% vs. 61%, P < 0.01). Despite these differences, the majority (greater than 90%) of the patients in both groups stated that they were comfortable during the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that although both techniques proved effective for sedation in patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy, ketamine is superior to alfentanil when used in combination with propofol because of the high patient satisfaction and amnesia.

摘要

背景

在纤维支气管镜检查期间,丙泊酚、氯胺酮、苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物最常用于单独或联合镇静。本研究的目的是比较丙泊酚/氯胺酮与丙泊酚/阿芬太尼在纤维支气管镜检查期间用于患者自控镇静(PCS)的临床疗效。

方法

接受纤维支气管镜检查的患者通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置随机分配接受丙泊酚/阿芬太尼(PA组;n = 138)或丙泊酚/氯胺酮(PK组;n = 138)进行镇静和镇痛。监测血压、心率(HR)和血氧饱和度的变化。使用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)(0 = 极度不适至10 = 极度舒适)评估患者和支气管镜检查医生的满意度。

结果

镇静后,PA组的收缩压(SAP)下降,但PK组的SAP稳定。与开始支气管镜检查前的值相比,两组在检查过程中SAP和HR均升高(P < 0.05)。PK组患者表现出更高的满意度[(9.5(6 - 10)对9.0(6 - 10)),P < 0.05]和遗忘效果(82%对61%,P < 0.01)。尽管存在这些差异,但两组中大多数(超过90%)患者表示在检查过程中感觉舒适。

结论

我们的结果表明,虽然两种技术在纤维支气管镜检查患者的镇静中均被证明有效,但氯胺酮与丙泊酚联合使用时优于阿芬太尼,因为患者满意度高且有遗忘效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验