• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜂窝织炎性和脓肿形成性耳鼻喉感染:头孢曲松与阿莫西林-克拉维酸的疗效比较

Phlegmonous and abscess-forming ENT infections: comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.

作者信息

Panosetti E

机构信息

Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.

出版信息

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1992;54(2):95-9. doi: 10.1159/000276271.

DOI:10.1159/000276271
PMID:1614693
Abstract

In this randomized trial, 100 patients received ceftriaxone or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in phlegmonous or abscess-forming ENT infections. Clinical and bacteriological results confirm that both antibiotics are equally effective, the advantage of ceftriaxone being one administration a day. Drainage surgery is necessary when an abscess has already formed. In 4 cases (ceftriaxone: 3; amoxicillin-clavulanic acid: 1), no positive response could be observed. Systemic and local tolerance was, as a general rule, excellent, and side effects were reported in 3 cases of the ceftriaxone group and in 3 cases of the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group.

摘要

在这项随机试验中,100例患有蜂窝织炎或脓肿形成的耳鼻喉感染患者接受了头孢曲松或阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗。临床和细菌学结果证实,两种抗生素同样有效,头孢曲松的优势在于每日给药一次。脓肿形成时需要进行引流手术。4例患者(头孢曲松组:3例;阿莫西林-克拉维酸组:1例)未观察到阳性反应。一般来说,全身和局部耐受性良好,头孢曲松组有3例报告了副作用,阿莫西林-克拉维酸组也有3例报告了副作用。

相似文献

1
Phlegmonous and abscess-forming ENT infections: comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.蜂窝织炎性和脓肿形成性耳鼻喉感染:头孢曲松与阿莫西林-克拉维酸的疗效比较
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1992;54(2):95-9. doi: 10.1159/000276271.
2
Cefixime versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in lower respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Jan;27(1):30-3.
3
Oral clindamycin 300 mg BID compared with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1 g BID in the outpatient treatment of acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis caused by group a beta-hemolytic streptococci: an international, multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, prospective trial in patients between the ages of 12 and 60 years.口服克林霉素300毫克,每日两次,与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸1克,每日两次,用于门诊治疗由A组β溶血性链球菌引起的急性复发性咽扁桃体炎:一项针对12至60岁患者的国际、多中心、随机、研究者设盲的前瞻性试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.006.
4
[Clinical evaluation of an amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination in respiratory tract infections].阿莫西林-克拉维酸组合用于呼吸道感染的临床评估
Clin Ter. 1987 Feb 15;120(3):211-8.
5
[Comparison of azithromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefaclor in the treatment of acute ENT infections].阿奇霉素、阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢克洛治疗急性耳鼻喉感染的比较
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1998 May;49(4):306-12.
6
Double-blind comparative study of two dosage regimens of cefaclor and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in the outpatient treatment of soft tissue infections.头孢克洛与阿莫西林-克拉维酸两种给药方案门诊治疗软组织感染的双盲对照研究
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Dec;24(6):856-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.24.6.856.
7
[Experimental and clinical studies on BRL 25000 (clavulanic acid-amoxicillin) in the pediatric field].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1985 Feb;38(2):342-58.
8
Activities of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid combinations against urinary tract infections.阿莫西林与克拉维酸联合用药对尿路感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Aug;22(2):346-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.2.346.
9
[Clinical trials of the combination amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in pediatrics].阿莫西林-克拉维酸联合制剂在儿科的临床试验
Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1985 Dec;32(10):895-9.
10
Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid versus cefotaxime in the therapy of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients.阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢噻肟治疗肝硬化患者细菌感染的疗效比较
J Hepatol. 2000 Apr;32(4):596-602. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80221-4.