Suppr超能文献

机械通气新生儿的呼吸力学:被动充气与阻断法的比较

Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated newborns: a comparison between passive inflation and occlusion methods.

作者信息

Storme L, Riou Y, Leclerc F, Kacet N, Dubos J P, Gremillet C, Rousseau S, Lequien P

机构信息

Neonatal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Lille, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 1992 Apr;12(4):203-12. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950120403.

Abstract

A passive inflation method was described for measuring total respiratory elastance and resistance during mechanical ventilation in adult patients (Rossi et al., J Appl Physiol 58:1849, 1985). We applied this method to preterm and full-term mechanically ventilated newborn infants and we compared the results with those obtained by the occlusion method. We performed 37 tests in 16 newborn infants (B.W. 880-4,500 g; G.A. 28-42 weeks), between 1 and 45 days of postnatal age, ventilated with a Servo Ventilator 900C, set in controlled-volume mode. Flow was measured through a pneumotachograph inserted between the endotracheal tube (ETT) and the breathing circuit, tidal volume by integration of flow and airway pressure directly at the airway opening. Flow, volume, and pressure were recorded on an X/Y plotter to obtain pressure-volume (P/V), flow-volume (V/V) loops, and pressure-time curves. Occlusion was performed by using the end-inspiratory and the end-expiratory pause buttons of the ventilator. Analysis of P/V and V/V loops provided respiratory system compliance (Crs, infl.), resistance (Rrs, infl.), and "intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure" (PEEPi, infl.). These values were compared with Crs, occl., Rrs, occl., and PEEPi, occl. measured by the occlusion method. The measurements were well correlated (Crs, infl./Crs, occl.: r = 0.90; Rrs, infl./Rrs, occl.: r = 0.91; PEEPi, infl./PEEPi, occl.: r = 0.91). Rrs, infl./Rrs, occl. and PEEPi, infl./PEEPi, occl. did not differ significantly. However, Crs, occl. was 15% higher than Crs, infl. (P less than 0.01). The passive inflation method is simple to use and well tolerated in preterm and full-term ventilated newborn infants, it provides accurate results, and can be a good alternative to occlusion methods. It requires, however, a constant inflation flow and adaptation to the ventilator.

摘要

一种被动充气法被描述用于测量成年患者机械通气时的总呼吸弹性和阻力(Rossi等人,《应用生理学杂志》58:1849,1985年)。我们将此方法应用于早产和足月机械通气的新生儿,并将结果与通过阻断法获得的结果进行比较。我们对16名新生儿(体重880 - 4500克;胎龄28 - 42周)进行了37次测试,这些新生儿出生后1至45天,使用Servo Ventilator 900C呼吸机,设置为容量控制模式。通过插入气管内导管(ETT)和呼吸回路之间的呼吸流速仪测量流量,通过直接在气道开口处对流量和气道压力进行积分来测量潮气量。流量(Flow)、容积(Volume)和压力(Pressure)记录在X/Y记录仪上,以获得压力 - 容积(P/V)、流量 - 容积(V/V)环以及压力 - 时间曲线。通过使用呼吸机的吸气末和呼气末暂停按钮进行阻断。对P/V和V/V环的分析提供了呼吸系统顺应性(Crs,infl.)、阻力(Rrs,infl.)和“内在呼气末正压”(PEEPi,infl.)。将这些值与通过阻断法测量的Crs,occl.、Rrs,occl.和PEEPi,occl.进行比较。测量结果具有良好的相关性(Crs,infl./Crs,occl.:r = 0.90;Rrs,infl./Rrs,occl.:r = 0.91;PEEPi,infl./PEEPi,occl.:r = 0.91)。Rrs,infl./Rrs,occl.和PEEPi,infl./PEEPi,occl.没有显著差异。然而,Crs,occl.比Crs,infl.高15%(P < 0.01)。被动充气法使用简单,在早产和足月通气的新生儿中耐受性良好,能提供准确结果,并且可以是阻断法的一个良好替代方法。然而,它需要恒定的充气流量并适应呼吸机。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验