Iotti G A, Braschi A, Brunner J X, Smits T, Olivei M, Palo A, Veronesi R
Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Policlinico S Matteo IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 1995 May;21(5):406-13. doi: 10.1007/BF01707409.
To evaluate a least squares fitting technique for the purpose of measuring total respiratory compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs) in patients submitted to partial ventilatory support, without the need for esophageal pressure measurement.
Prospective, randomized study.
A general ICU of a University Hospital.
11 patients in acute respiratory failure, intubated and assisted by pressure support ventilation (PSV).
Patients were ventilated at 4 different levels of pressure support. At the end of the study, they were paralyzed for diagnostic reasons and submitted to volume controlled ventilation (CMV).
A least squares fitting (LSF) method was applied to measure Crs and Rrs at different levels of pressure support as well as in CMV. Crs and Rrs calculated by the LSF method were compared to reference values which were obtained in PSV by measurement of esophageal pressure, and in CMV by the application of the constant flow, end-inspiratory occlusion method. Inspiratory activity was measured by P0.1. In CMV, Crs and Rrs measured by the LSF method are close to quasistatic compliance (-1.5 +/- 1.5 ml/cmH2O) and to the mean value of minimum and maximum end-inspiratory resistance (+0.9 +/- 2.5 cmH2O/(l/s)). Applied during PSV, the LSF method leads to gross underestimation of Rrs (-10.4 +/- 2.3 cmH2O/(l/s)) and overestimation of Crs (+35.2 +/- 33 ml/cmH2O) whenever the set pressure support level is low and the activity of the respiratory muscles is high (P0.1 was 4.6 +/- 3.1 cmH2O). However, satisfactory estimations of Crs and Rrs by the LSF method were obtained at increased pressure support levels, resulting in a mean error of -0.4 +/- 6 ml/cmH2O and -2.8 +/- 1.5 cmH2O/(l/s), respectively. This condition was coincident with a P0.1 of 1.6 +/- 0.7 cmH2O.
The LSF method allows non-invasive evaluation of respiratory mechanics during PSV, provided that a near-relaxation condition is obtained by means of an adequately increased pressure support level. The measurement of P0.1 may be helpful for titrating the pressure support in order to obtain the condition of near-relaxation.
评估一种最小二乘法拟合技术,用于测量接受部分通气支持的患者的总呼吸顺应性(Crs)和阻力(Rrs),而无需测量食管压力。
前瞻性随机研究。
大学医院的综合重症监护病房。
11例急性呼吸衰竭患者,经气管插管并接受压力支持通气(PSV)。
患者在4种不同水平的压力支持下进行通气。在研究结束时,出于诊断目的使其麻痹,并接受容量控制通气(CMV)。
应用最小二乘法拟合(LSF)方法测量不同压力支持水平以及CMV状态下的Crs和Rrs。将LSF方法计算得到的Crs和Rrs与参考值进行比较,参考值在PSV时通过测量食管压力获得,在CMV时通过应用恒定流量、吸气末阻断法获得。吸气活动通过P0.1进行测量。在CMV中,LSF方法测量的Crs和Rrs接近准静态顺应性(-1.5±1.5 ml/cmH2O)以及吸气末最小和最大阻力的平均值(+0.9±2.5 cmH2O/(l/s))。在PSV期间应用时,只要设定的压力支持水平较低且呼吸肌活动较高(P0.1为4.6±3.1 cmH2O),LSF方法会导致Rrs严重低估(-10.4±2.3 cmH2O/(l/s))和Crs高估(+35.2±33 ml/cmH2O)。然而,在较高的压力支持水平下,LSF方法对Crs和Rrs的估计令人满意,平均误差分别为-0.4±6 ml/cmH2O和-2.8±1.5 cmH2O/(l/s)。这种情况与P0.1为1.6±0.7 cmH2O相符。
LSF方法允许在PSV期间对呼吸力学进行无创评估,前提是通过充分提高压力支持水平获得接近松弛的状态。测量P0.1可能有助于调整压力支持以获得接近松弛的状态。