Gerhardt T, Reifenberg L, Duara S, Bancalari E
Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL 33101.
J Pediatr. 1989 Jan;114(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80618-3.
The objective of this study was to compare the conventional method of measuring respiratory mechanics, which requires the passage of an esophageal tube, with the occlusion technique, which is less invasive. Thirty-nine preterm infants who received mechanical ventilation on the first day were studied before discharge (mean +/- SD: postnatal age 67 +/- 23 days; weight 1790 +/- 300 gm), and 27 of them again at 1 year (weight 8.1 +/- 1.4 kg). Flows were measured through a nosepiece by pneumotachometry, tidal volume by integration of flow, esophageal pressure through a water-filled tube, and airway pressure directly at the nasal piece. Airway occlusion was performed at the end of inspiration, and the following relaxed exhalation was analyzed to give compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs) of the respiratory system. These values were compared with dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and expiratory resistance (Re) of the previous unoccluded breath. In the younger infants, dynamic and static measurements did not differ significantly and were well correlated (Cdyn/Crs, r = 0.91; Re/Rrs, r = 0.95). In the older infants, Crs was 80% of Cdyn (p less than 0.001), and Rrs was 24% higher than Re (p less than 0.001). The measurements were well correlated (Cdyn/Crs, r = 0.94; Re/Rrs, r = 0.91). The regression line Cdyn versus Crs had a slope (0.77) significantly less than 1; the regression Re versus Rrs had an intercept (13.8) significantly greater than zero. The lower Crs and higher Rrs values can be expected because the static determinations include the chest wall. In the more immature infants, the very compliant chest wall, in combination with an underestimation of Cdyn because of the higher breathing frequency of these infants, may obscure this difference. We conclude that the occlusion technique gives accurate and reproducible results, is easily applied, does not need the passage of an esophageal tube, and is well tolerated by the infants.
本研究的目的是比较传统的测量呼吸力学的方法(该方法需要插入食管导管)与侵入性较小的阻断技术。对39名出生第一天接受机械通气的早产儿在出院前进行了研究(平均±标准差:出生后年龄67±23天;体重1790±300克),其中27名在1岁时再次进行研究(体重8.1±1.4千克)。通过鼻罩用呼吸流速计测量气流,通过气流积分测量潮气量,通过充水管测量食管压力,直接在鼻罩处测量气道压力。在吸气末进行气道阻断,并分析随后的松弛呼气以得出呼吸系统的顺应性(Crs)和阻力(Rrs)。将这些值与前一次未阻断呼吸的动态肺顺应性(Cdyn)和呼气阻力(Re)进行比较。在较小的婴儿中,动态和静态测量结果无显著差异且相关性良好(Cdyn/Crs,r = 0.91;Re/Rrs,r = 0.95)。在较大的婴儿中,Crs为Cdyn的80%(p < 0.001),Rrs比Re高24%(p < 0.001)。测量结果相关性良好(Cdyn/Crs,r = 0.94;Re/Rrs,r = 0.91)。Cdyn与Crs的回归线斜率(0.77)显著小于1;Re与Rrs的回归线截距(13.8)显著大于零。由于静态测定包括胸壁,因此可以预期Crs较低而Rrs较高。在更不成熟的婴儿中,非常顺应的胸壁,加上由于这些婴儿较高的呼吸频率导致Cdyn被低估,可能会掩盖这种差异。我们得出结论,阻断技术能给出准确且可重复的结果,易于应用,无需插入食管导管,并且婴儿耐受性良好。