• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陪伴式问诊对老年患者以患者为中心的影响。

Influence of accompanied encounters on patient-centeredness with older patients.

作者信息

Shields Cleveland G, Epstein Ronald M, Fiscella Kevin, Franks Peter, McCann Robert, McCormick Kevin, Mallinger Julie B

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, Rochester Center to Improve Communication in Health Care, Rochester, NY 14620-2830, USA.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Sep-Oct;18(5):344-54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.344.

DOI:10.3122/jabfm.18.5.344
PMID:16148244
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a pilot study to examine physician patient interaction when elderly patients are accompanied during a medical visit.

METHODS

This was a study in which 30 patients were randomly assigned to be accompanied (13) or unaccompanied (17) during a regular medical visit to their physician. Visits were tape recorded, transcribed, and coded with the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (MPCC) and with the Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD).

RESULTS

We found no differences between the number of words spoken in accompanied versus unaccompanied visits, comparing patients alone with patients and companions combined. Physicians spoke longer without interruption in accompanied encounters (39.9 vs 78.6 words per speech turn). There were no differences in the level of MPCC or in the level of participatory decision making between the 2 types of visits. In accompanied visits, patients introduced most of the concerns and physicians discussed concerns with patients more than with companions.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously reported differences in accompanied versus unaccompanied visits may reflect patients' preferences for being accompanied, the role they wish their companion to play, and the patients' health status. Being accompanied by a family member or friend does not result in less attention being paid to patients' concerns.

摘要

目的

开展一项试点研究,以考察老年患者在就医时有陪同人员在场时医患之间的互动情况。

方法

本研究中,30名患者在定期看诊时被随机分配为有陪同人员(13人)或无陪同人员(17人)。就诊过程进行录音、转录,并使用以患者为中心的沟通量表(MPCC)和罗切斯特参与式决策量表(RPAD)进行编码。

结果

将单独就诊的患者与有陪同人员的患者进行比较,我们发现有陪同人员和无陪同人员就诊时所说的单词数量没有差异。在有陪同人员在场的问诊中,医生不间断讲话的时间更长(每次讲话轮次分别为39.9个单词和78.6个单词)。两种类型的就诊在MPCC水平或参与式决策水平上没有差异。在有陪同人员的就诊中,患者提出了大部分问题,并且医生与患者讨论问题的时间多于与陪同人员讨论的时间。

结论

先前报道的有陪同人员和无陪同人员就诊之间的差异可能反映了患者对有人陪同的偏好、他们希望陪同人员所扮演的角色以及患者的健康状况。由家庭成员或朋友陪同并不会导致对患者问题的关注减少。

相似文献

1
Influence of accompanied encounters on patient-centeredness with older patients.陪伴式问诊对老年患者以患者为中心的影响。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Sep-Oct;18(5):344-54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.344.
2
Examining the context and helpfulness of family companion contributions to older adults' primary care visits.审视家庭陪伴者对老年人初级保健就诊的贡献的背景及帮助作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
3
Patients' perceptions of visit companions' helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits.日本老年医学就诊期间患者对陪同就诊者帮助程度的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Apr;61(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.010. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
4
Companion participation in cancer consultations.伴侣参与癌症会诊。
Psychooncology. 2008 Mar;17(3):244-51. doi: 10.1002/pon.1225.
5
Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults.显而易见却易被忽视:医疗探访陪伴者作为弱势老年人的一种资源
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1409-15. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1409.
6
Older adults' mental health function and patient-centered care: does the presence of a family companion help or hinder communication?老年人的心理健康功能和以患者为中心的护理:家庭陪伴者的存在是否有助于或阻碍沟通?
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):661-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1957-5. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
7
Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD): reliability and validity.罗切斯特参与性决策量表(RPAD):信度与效度
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):436-42. doi: 10.1370/afm.305.
8
Assessing patient-centered communication in a family practice setting: how do we measure it, and whose opinion matters?评估家庭医疗环境中的以患者为中心的沟通:我们如何衡量它,以及谁的意见重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep;84(3):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.027. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
9
A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study.一种增强初级保健中老年患者-同伴伙伴关系的工具:一项试点研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):312-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12639. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
10
Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters.日本老年医疗问诊中医护人员-老年患者-陪伴者之间的沟通及陪伴者的角色
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2307-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.071. Epub 2004 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Factors Behind Patients' Desire and Decision to be Accompanied: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.探究患者渴望并决定有人陪同背后的因素:一项横断面分析。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70102. doi: 10.1111/hex.70102.
2
How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.技术如何影响癌症患者及其医疗保健提供者之间的沟通:系统文献回顾。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104430. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Impact of hearing loss on clinical interactions between older adults and health professionals: a systematic review.
听力损失对老年人与医疗专业人员临床互动的影响:一项系统综述
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Dec;11(6):919-928. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00358-3. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
4
The role of a companion attending consultations with the patient. A systematic review.陪伴者在患者就诊咨询中的作用。系统评价。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):743-750. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1920-0. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Family presence and participation during medical visits of heart failure patients: An analysis of survey and audiotaped communication data.心力衰竭患者就诊期间家属的陪伴与参与:基于调查与录音沟通数据的分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
6
A Narrative Review of Patient and Family Engagement: The "Foundation" of the Medical "Home".患者及家属参与的叙述性综述:医学“家庭”的“基石”
Med Care. 2016 Jul;54(7):697-705. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000548.
7
"Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer.“代言”与“以……身份发言”:晚期癌症医患陪伴式医疗接触中的假性代孕
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
Role and Influence of the Patient's Companion in Family Medicine Consultations: "The Patient's Perspective".患者陪伴者在家庭医学咨询中的角色与影响:“患者视角”
J Family Med Prim Care. 2013 Jul;2(3):283-7. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.120767.
9
A trustful relationship--the importance for relatives to actively participate in the meeting with the physician.建立信任关系——亲属积极参与医患会谈的重要性。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2013 May 20;8:20608. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v8i0.20608.
10
Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.癌症护理中的价值观和选择(VOICE):一项以患者为中心的沟通和决策干预的研究设计和理论基础,该干预面向医生、晚期癌症患者及其照护者。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Apr 9;13:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-188.