Suppr超能文献

“代言”与“以……身份发言”:晚期癌症医患陪伴式医疗接触中的假性代孕

"Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer.

作者信息

Mazer Benjamin L, Cameron Rachel A, DeLuca Jane M, Mohile Supriya G, Epstein Ronald M

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine using audio-recorded encounters the extent and process of companion participation when discussing treatment choices and prognosis in the context of a life-limiting cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

Qualitative analysis of transcribed outpatient visits between 17 oncologists, 49 patients with advanced cancer, and 34 companions.

RESULTS

46 qualifying companion statements were collected from a total of 28 conversations about treatment choices or prognosis. We identified a range of companion positions, from "pseudo-surrogacy" (companion speaking as if the patient were not able to speak for himself), "hearsay", "conflation of thoughts", "co-experiencing", "observation as an outsider", and "facilitation". Statements made by companions were infrequently directly validated by the patient.

CONCLUSION

Companions often spoke on behalf of patients during discussions of prognosis and treatment choices, even when the patient was present and capable of speaking on his or her own behalf.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The conversational role of companions as well as whether the physician checks with the patient can determine whether a companion facilitates or inhibits patient autonomy and involvement. Physicians can reduce ambiguity and encourage patient participation by being aware of when and how companions may speak on behalf of patients and by corroborating the companion's statement with the patient.

摘要

目的

通过音频记录的医患交流,研究在晚期癌症诊断背景下讨论治疗选择和预后时陪伴者参与的程度和过程。

方法

对17名肿瘤学家、49名晚期癌症患者和34名陪伴者之间的门诊就诊记录进行定性分析。

结果

在总共28次关于治疗选择或预后的对话中,收集到46条符合条件的陪伴者陈述。我们确定了一系列陪伴者的立场,从“假代理”(陪伴者说话就好像患者无法为自己说话一样)、“道听途说”、“思想混淆”、“共同体验”、“作为局外人的观察”到“促进”。陪伴者的陈述很少得到患者的直接认可。

结论

即使患者在场且能够代表自己发言,陪伴者在讨论预后和治疗选择时仍经常代表患者发言。

实践意义

陪伴者的对话角色以及医生是否与患者核实情况,会决定陪伴者是促进还是抑制患者的自主性和参与度。医生可以通过了解陪伴者何时以及如何代表患者发言,并与患者核实陪伴者的陈述,来减少模糊性并鼓励患者参与。

相似文献

1
"Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
2
A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):312-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12639. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
3
Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2307-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.071. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
5
Patients' perceptions of visit companions' helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Apr;61(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.010. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
6
Examining the context and helpfulness of family companion contributions to older adults' primary care visits.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Companion participation in cancer consultations.
Psychooncology. 2008 Mar;17(3):244-51. doi: 10.1002/pon.1225.
9
Patient-centered communication strategies for patients with aphasia: discrepancies between what patients want and what physicians do.
Disabil Health J. 2015 Apr;8(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
An exploration of patient and family engagement in routine primary care visits.
Health Expect. 2015 Apr;18(2):188-98. doi: 10.1111/hex.12019. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

4
Healthcare provider assessments of caregiver communication behaviors during gynecologic Cancer treatment appointments.
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 1;4:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 23;32(2):127. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08230-3.
10

本文引用的文献

1
The ambiguity of personhood.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(8):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.804746.
3
Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
4
What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear.
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):94S-112S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712459216. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
5
Whole mind and shared mind in clinical decision-making.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
6
Are you talking to me?! An exploration of the triadic physician-patient-companion communication within memory clinics encounters.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
8
Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):823-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
9
Prognostic significance of the "surprise" question in cancer patients.
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):837-40. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0018.
10
Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul;25(7):741-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2. Epub 2010 Mar 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验