Suppr超能文献

内镜下静脉曲张结扎术与普萘洛尔预防首次静脉曲张出血的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Endoscopic variceal ligation vs. propranolol for prevention of first variceal bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Psilopoulos Dimitrios, Galanis Petros, Goulas Spyros, Papanikolaou Ioannis S, Elefsiniotis Ioannis, Liatsos Christos, Sparos Loukas, Mavrogiannis Christos

机构信息

Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Helena Venizelou General Hospital, Faculty of Nursing, Athens University, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Oct;17(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200510000-00016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data in the literature regarding the role of endoscopic variceal ligation for the prevention of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients are controversial. To further explore this issue we have compared ligation and propranolol treatment in a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Sixty patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history but at high risk of bleeding were randomized to ligation treatment (30 patients) or propranolol (30 patients). Patients were followed for approximately 27.5 months.

RESULTS

Variceal obliteration was achieved in 28 patients (93.3%) after 3+/-1 sessions. The mean daily dose of propranolol was 60.3+/-13.3 mg. Two patients (6.7%) in the ligation group and nine patients (30%) in the propranolol group developed variceal bleeding (P = 0.043). The actuarial risks of variceal bleeding at 2 years were 6.7% and 25%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, propranolol treatment and grade III varices turned out to be predictive factors for the risk of variceal bleeding. Mortality was not different between the two groups. There were no serious complications due to ligation. Propranolol treatment was discontinued in four patients because of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Variceal ligation is a safe and more effective method than propranolol treatment for the prevention of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk varices.

摘要

目的

文献中关于内镜下静脉曲张结扎术在预防肝硬化患者首次静脉曲张出血方面作用的数据存在争议。为进一步探讨该问题,我们在一项前瞻性随机研究中比较了结扎术与普萘洛尔治疗。

方法

60例无出血史但有高出血风险的肝硬化和食管静脉曲张患者被随机分为结扎治疗组(30例)和普萘洛尔组(30例)。对患者进行了约27.5个月的随访。

结果

经过3±1次治疗后,28例患者(93.3%)实现了静脉曲张闭塞。普萘洛尔的平均日剂量为60.3±13.3毫克。结扎组有2例患者(6.7%)发生静脉曲张出血,普萘洛尔组有9例患者(30%)发生静脉曲张出血(P = 0.043)。2年时静脉曲张出血的精算风险分别为6.7%和25%。多因素分析显示,普萘洛尔治疗和III级静脉曲张是静脉曲张出血风险的预测因素。两组的死亡率无差异。结扎术未引起严重并发症。4例患者因副作用停用了普萘洛尔治疗。

结论

对于高风险静脉曲张的肝硬化患者,静脉曲张结扎术是一种比普萘洛尔治疗更安全、更有效的预防首次静脉曲张出血的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验