Grammer Michael, Kuchay Shafi, Chishti Athar, Baudry Michel
Neuroscience Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520, USA.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2005 Nov;84(3):222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2005.07.007. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
We previously proposed the hypothesis that calpain activation played an important role in long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic transmission in hippocampus. Two forms of calpain are predominant in brain tissues, calpain 1 (mu-calpain), activated by micromolar calcium concentration and calpain 2 (m-calpain), activated by millimolar calcium concentration in vitro. In the present study, we tested the role of calpain 1 in LTP and in learning and memory using calpain 1 knock-out mice. Changes in learning and memory were assessed using both context and tone fear conditioning. No differences in freezing responses were observed between the knock-out and the wild-type animals during the acquisition phase of the training, eliminating the possibility that the knock-out animals could be differentially affected by the foot shock. Likewise, no differences in freezing responses elicited by either the context or the tone were observed during the retention phase. No differences in short-term potentiation (STP) or LTP were observed in hippocampal slices from the knock-out and matched wild-type mice. Several interpretations might explain these negative results. First, it is conceivable that calpain 2 plays a more dominant role in neurons, and that calpain 1 makes a minor contribution as opposed to its suspected predominant role in the hematopoietic system. Alternatively, it is conceivable that some as yet unknown compensatory mechanisms take effect, and that calpain 2 or another calpain isoform substitutes for the missing calpain 1.
我们之前提出了一个假说,即钙蛋白酶的激活在海马体突触传递的长时程增强(LTP)中发挥重要作用。在脑组织中,两种形式的钙蛋白酶占主导地位,即钙蛋白酶1(μ-钙蛋白酶),在体外由微摩尔浓度的钙激活;以及钙蛋白酶2(m-钙蛋白酶),在体外由毫摩尔浓度的钙激活。在本研究中,我们使用钙蛋白酶1基因敲除小鼠来测试钙蛋白酶1在LTP以及学习和记忆中的作用。使用情境恐惧条件反射和音调恐惧条件反射来评估学习和记忆的变化。在训练的习得阶段,基因敲除动物和野生型动物之间未观察到僵住反应的差异,排除了基因敲除动物可能受到足部电击不同影响的可能性。同样,在记忆保持阶段,由情境或音调引发的僵住反应也未观察到差异。在基因敲除小鼠和配对的野生型小鼠的海马体切片中,未观察到短期突触增强(STP)或LTP的差异。有几种解释可以说明这些阴性结果。首先,可以想象钙蛋白酶2在神经元中发挥更主导的作用,而钙蛋白酶1的贡献较小,这与它在造血系统中被怀疑的主导作用相反。或者,可以想象一些尚未知晓 的补偿机制发挥了作用,并且钙蛋白酶2或另一种钙蛋白酶同工型替代了缺失的钙蛋白酶1。