Suppr超能文献

全椎间盘置换术后运动测量的可靠性:尖峰和鳍状法

Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

作者信息

Cakir Balkan, Richter Marcus, Puhl Wolfhart, Schmidt René

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Spinal Cord Injury, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2006 Feb;15(2):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0942-2. Epub 2005 Sep 8.

Abstract

As motion preservation is one of the main postulated advantages after total disc replacement (TDR) of the lumbar spine, the quantification of the mobility after TDR seems of special clinical interest. Yet, the best method to assess range of motion (ROM) after TDR remains unclear. The aim of the study was the calculation of 95%-confidence intervals (95%-C.I.) for the measurement error accompanying: (1) different methods (2) different observers and (3) different levels of training for radiographic motion analysis after TDR. In 12 patients the level L4-L5 and in another 12 patients level L5-S1 were measured with the Cobb and the superimposition method on flexion-extension X-rays after monosegmental TDR. Both methods were adopted as the landmarks used the spikes of the prosthesis instead the endplates (spike method) and the fin of the prosthesis instead the whole vertebral body (fin method). Measurements were performed by two experienced (O-I and O-III) and one inexperienced observer (O-II). The adopted spike and fin method showed a better reliability compared to the reported results of the original Cobb and superimposition method. The method used was not clinically relevant for the intraobserver reliability in the experienced observer (95%-C.I.: +/-2.0 degrees for the fin and +/-2.1 for the spike method) and for the interobserver reliability for two experienced observers (95%-C.I.: -2.8 degrees /+2.8 degrees for the fin and -2.9 degrees /+3.1 degrees for the spike method). The intraobserver reliability for the inexperienced observer was inferior for both methods compared to the experienced observer but no clinically relevant differences could be observed in interobserver reliability measures. The spike and fin method are reliable methods for study protocols dealing with angular motion after TDR as clinically valid conclusions can be drawn with an accuracy of about +/-2 degrees for the same observer and with an accuracy of about +/-3 degrees for a different observer.

摘要

由于保留运动功能是腰椎全椎间盘置换术(TDR)后主要的假定优势之一,因此TDR术后活动度的量化似乎具有特殊的临床意义。然而,评估TDR术后活动范围(ROM)的最佳方法仍不明确。本研究的目的是计算TDR术后放射学运动分析中,伴随(1)不同方法(2)不同观察者以及(3)不同训练水平的测量误差的95%置信区间(95%-C.I.)。在12例患者中,单节段TDR术后,通过Cobb法和叠加法在屈伸位X射线上测量L4-L5节段,在另外12例患者中测量L5-S1节段。两种方法均采用以假体钉代替终板(钉法)以及以假体鳍代替整个椎体(鳍法)作为标志点。测量由两名经验丰富的观察者(O-I和O-III)和一名经验不足的观察者(O-II)进行。与原始Cobb法和叠加法报道的结果相比,采用的钉法和鳍法显示出更好的可靠性。所使用的方法对于经验丰富的观察者的观察者内可靠性(95%-C.I.:鳍法为±2.0度,钉法为±2.1度)以及两名经验丰富的观察者之间的观察者间可靠性(95%-C.I.:鳍法为-2.8度/+2.8度,钉法为-2.9度/+3.1度)在临床上并不相关。与经验丰富的观察者相比,经验不足的观察者的观察者内可靠性在两种方法中均较差,但在观察者间可靠性测量中未观察到临床相关差异。钉法和鳍法是用于研究TDR术后角运动的可靠方法,因为对于同一观察者,临床有效结论可以以约±2度的精度得出,对于不同观察者,精度约为±3度。

相似文献

1
Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.
Eur Spine J. 2006 Feb;15(2):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0942-2. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
2
Evaluation of lumbar spine motion with dynamic X-ray--a reliability analysis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11):1258-64. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217763.80593.50.
3
Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 1;31(10):E291-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000216452.54421.ea.
6
The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignment and range of motion of the lumbar spine.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jul;19(5):307-11. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000208255.14329.1e.
7
Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0208-7. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
8
Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):527-36. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256915.90236.17.
9
Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):782-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259071.64027.04.

引用本文的文献

2
We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):201-240. doi: 10.14444/5029. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review.
Eur Spine J. 2015 Sep;24(9):1865-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3992-0. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
5
The parallax effect in the evaluation of range of motion in lumbar total disc replacement.
SAS J. 2008 Dec 1;2(4):184-8. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR. eCollection 2008.
8
Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis.
Eur Spine J. 2014 Nov;23(11):2330-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3286-y. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
10
Effects of lumbar artificial disc design on intervertebral mobility: in vivo comparison between mobile-core and fixed-core.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S630-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1650-0. Epub 2010 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
[Sagittal alignment and segmental range of motion after total disc replacement of the lumbar spine].
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2004 Mar-Apr;142(2):159-65. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-816275.
2
Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00008.
3
Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):352-61. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00007.
5
Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications.
Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S131-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0428-4. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
6
Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.
Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S124-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0446-2. Epub 2002 Aug 9.
7
Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges.
Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0445-3. Epub 2002 Aug 21.
9
Relationship between pain and vertebral motion in chronic low-back pain subjects.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2002 Jun;17(5):345-52. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00032-3.
10
The significance of high lumbar mobility and low lumbar strength for current and future low back pain in adolescents.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2629-36. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验