Cakir Balkan, Richter Marcus, Puhl Wolfhart, Schmidt René
Department of Orthopaedics and Spinal Cord Injury, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2006 Feb;15(2):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0942-2. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
As motion preservation is one of the main postulated advantages after total disc replacement (TDR) of the lumbar spine, the quantification of the mobility after TDR seems of special clinical interest. Yet, the best method to assess range of motion (ROM) after TDR remains unclear. The aim of the study was the calculation of 95%-confidence intervals (95%-C.I.) for the measurement error accompanying: (1) different methods (2) different observers and (3) different levels of training for radiographic motion analysis after TDR. In 12 patients the level L4-L5 and in another 12 patients level L5-S1 were measured with the Cobb and the superimposition method on flexion-extension X-rays after monosegmental TDR. Both methods were adopted as the landmarks used the spikes of the prosthesis instead the endplates (spike method) and the fin of the prosthesis instead the whole vertebral body (fin method). Measurements were performed by two experienced (O-I and O-III) and one inexperienced observer (O-II). The adopted spike and fin method showed a better reliability compared to the reported results of the original Cobb and superimposition method. The method used was not clinically relevant for the intraobserver reliability in the experienced observer (95%-C.I.: +/-2.0 degrees for the fin and +/-2.1 for the spike method) and for the interobserver reliability for two experienced observers (95%-C.I.: -2.8 degrees /+2.8 degrees for the fin and -2.9 degrees /+3.1 degrees for the spike method). The intraobserver reliability for the inexperienced observer was inferior for both methods compared to the experienced observer but no clinically relevant differences could be observed in interobserver reliability measures. The spike and fin method are reliable methods for study protocols dealing with angular motion after TDR as clinically valid conclusions can be drawn with an accuracy of about +/-2 degrees for the same observer and with an accuracy of about +/-3 degrees for a different observer.
由于保留运动功能是腰椎全椎间盘置换术(TDR)后主要的假定优势之一,因此TDR术后活动度的量化似乎具有特殊的临床意义。然而,评估TDR术后活动范围(ROM)的最佳方法仍不明确。本研究的目的是计算TDR术后放射学运动分析中,伴随(1)不同方法(2)不同观察者以及(3)不同训练水平的测量误差的95%置信区间(95%-C.I.)。在12例患者中,单节段TDR术后,通过Cobb法和叠加法在屈伸位X射线上测量L4-L5节段,在另外12例患者中测量L5-S1节段。两种方法均采用以假体钉代替终板(钉法)以及以假体鳍代替整个椎体(鳍法)作为标志点。测量由两名经验丰富的观察者(O-I和O-III)和一名经验不足的观察者(O-II)进行。与原始Cobb法和叠加法报道的结果相比,采用的钉法和鳍法显示出更好的可靠性。所使用的方法对于经验丰富的观察者的观察者内可靠性(95%-C.I.:鳍法为±2.0度,钉法为±2.1度)以及两名经验丰富的观察者之间的观察者间可靠性(95%-C.I.:鳍法为-2.8度/+2.8度,钉法为-2.9度/+3.1度)在临床上并不相关。与经验丰富的观察者相比,经验不足的观察者的观察者内可靠性在两种方法中均较差,但在观察者间可靠性测量中未观察到临床相关差异。钉法和鳍法是用于研究TDR术后角运动的可靠方法,因为对于同一观察者,临床有效结论可以以约±2度的精度得出,对于不同观察者,精度约为±3度。