Suppr超能文献

社区居住人群中血管性痴呆的医疗利用模式及费用

Patterns of healthcare utilization and costs for vascular dementia in a community-dwelling population.

作者信息

Hill Jerrold, Fillit Howard, Shah Sonali N, del Valle Megan C, Futterman Robert

机构信息

Institute for the Study of Aging, New York, NY 10019, USA.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2005 Sep;8(1):43-50. doi: 10.3233/jad-2005-8105.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most prevalent dementia diagnosis, little is known about healthcare use and costs for VaD.

PURPOSE

This study compares the healthcare use and costs of community-dwelling patients with VaD to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), other dementias (OD), cerebrovascular disease without dementia (CVD), and patients without dementia or cerebrovascular disease (controls).

METHODS

Using diagnoses codes from medical claims and encounter records, 678 VaD, 1,722 AD, 957 OD, 2,718 CVD, and 14,023 controls were identified from patients enrolled in a 100,000-member group practice Medicare HMO during 1999-2002. Annual healthcare use and costs of the study groups were compared, using regression analysis to control for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

VaD patients had the highest annual costs, dollars 14,387, followed by dollars 10,716 for OD, dollars 8,254 for CVD, and dollars 7,839 for AD, and dollars 5,494 for controls (p<0.0001 for all comparisons to VaD). Despite higher total direct costs, VaD patients had lower costs for physician visits and prescription drugs compared with all study groups except OD. In contrast, CVD patients had the highest costs for these services. Moreover, hospital admissions for VaD were nearly twice those for CVD, and hospital days for VaD nearly three times those for CVD, despite the high prevalence of cardiovascular conditions for both VaD and CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

VaD patients had higher healthcare costs compared to all other patient groups. The substantially higher costs for VaD compared to CVD and the differences in use of healthcare services by VaD compared to CVD suggest that dementia, not cerebrovascular disease, is a major source of the cost differences. Lower costs for physician visits and prescription drugs for VaD suggest possible opportunities for improving ambulatory care and preventing high-cost hospitalizations.

摘要

背景

虽然血管性痴呆(VaD)是第二常见的痴呆诊断类型,但对于VaD的医疗服务使用情况和成本却知之甚少。

目的

本研究比较了社区居住的VaD患者与阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者、其他痴呆(OD)患者、无痴呆的脑血管疾病(CVD)患者以及无痴呆或脑血管疾病的患者(对照组)的医疗服务使用情况和成本。

方法

利用医疗理赔和就诊记录中的诊断代码,从1999 - 2002年参加10万成员团体执业医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)的患者中识别出678例VaD患者、1722例AD患者、957例OD患者、2718例CVD患者和14023例对照组患者。比较各研究组的年度医疗服务使用情况和成本,并使用回归分析来控制患者特征。

结果

VaD患者的年度成本最高,为14387美元,其次是OD患者为10716美元,CVD患者为8254美元,AD患者为8254美元,对照组为5494美元(与VaD的所有比较中p<0.0001)。尽管总直接成本较高,但与除OD外的所有研究组相比,VaD患者的门诊就诊和处方药成本较低。相比之下,CVD患者在这些服务上的成本最高。此外,VaD患者的住院次数几乎是CVD患者的两倍,VaD患者的住院天数几乎是CVD患者的三倍,尽管VaD和CVD患者的心血管疾病患病率都很高。

结论

与所有其他患者组相比,VaD患者的医疗成本更高。与CVD相比,VaD的成本大幅更高,且VaD与CVD在医疗服务使用上的差异表明,痴呆而非脑血管疾病是成本差异的主要来源。VaD患者门诊就诊和处方药成本较低,提示改善门诊护理和预防高成本住院的可能机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验