Delecluse C, Roelants M, Diels R, Koninckx E, Verschueren S
Exercise Physiology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;26(8):662-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830381.
Despite the expanding use of Whole Body Vibration training among athletes, it is not known whether adding Whole Body Vibration training to the conventional training of sprint-trained athletes will improve speed-strength performance. Twenty experienced sprint-trained athletes (13 male symbol, 7 female symbol, 17-30 years old) were randomly assigned to a Whole Body Vibration group (n=10: 6 male symbol and 4 female symbol) or a Control group (n=10: 7 male symbol, 3 female symbol). During a 5-week experimental period all subjects continued their conventional training program, but the subjects of the Whole Body Vibration group additionally performed three times weekly a Whole Body Vibration training prior to their conventional training program. The Whole Body Vibration program consisted of unloaded static and dynamic leg exercises on a vibration platform (35-40 Hz, 1.7-2.5 mm, Power Plate). Pre and post isometric and dynamic (100 degrees/s) knee-extensor and -flexor strength and knee-extension velocity at fixed resistances were measured by means of a motor-driven dynamometer (Rev 9000, Technogym). Vertical jump performance was measured by means of a contact mat. Force-time characteristics of the start action were assessed using a load cell mounted on each starting block. Sprint running velocity was recorded by means of a laser system. Isometric and dynamic knee-extensor and knee-flexor strength were unaffected (p>0.05) in the Whole Body Vibration group and the Control group. As well, knee-extension velocity remained unchanged (p>0.05). The duration of the start action, the resulting start velocity, start acceleration, and sprint running velocity did not change (>0.05) in either group. In conclusion, this specific Whole Body Vibration protocol of 5 weeks had no surplus value upon the conventional training program to improve speed-strength performance in sprint-trained athletes.
尽管全身振动训练在运动员中的应用越来越广泛,但对于在短跑训练的运动员的常规训练中增加全身振动训练是否能提高速度力量表现,目前尚不清楚。20名有经验的短跑训练运动员(13名男性,7名女性,年龄17 - 30岁)被随机分为全身振动组(n = 10:6名男性和4名女性)或对照组(n = 10:7名男性,3名女性)。在为期5周的实验期内,所有受试者继续他们的常规训练计划,但全身振动组的受试者在常规训练计划之前每周额外进行三次全身振动训练。全身振动计划包括在振动平台(35 - 40Hz,1.7 - 2.5mm,Power Plate)上进行无负荷的静态和动态腿部练习。通过电动测力计(Rev 9000,Technogym)测量等长和动态(100度/秒)膝关节伸肌和屈肌力量以及固定阻力下的膝关节伸展速度。通过接触垫测量垂直跳跃表现。使用安装在每个起跑器上的测力传感器评估起跑动作的力 - 时间特性。通过激光系统记录短跑速度。全身振动组和对照组的等长和动态膝关节伸肌和屈肌力量未受影响(p>0.05)。同样,膝关节伸展速度保持不变(p>0.05)。两组的起跑动作持续时间、起跑速度、起跑加速度和短跑速度均未改变(>0.05)。总之,这一为期5周的特定全身振动方案在常规训练计划基础上,对提高短跑训练运动员的速度力量表现没有额外价值。