Wen Ming-Chun, Wei Chun-Hua, Hu Zhao-Qiu, Srivastava Kamal, Ko Jimmy, Xi Su-Ting, Mu Dong-Zhen, Du Ji-Bin, Li Guo-Hua, Wallenstein Sylvan, Sampson Hugh, Kattan Meyer, Li Xiu-Min
Weifang Asthma Hospital, Shandong, China.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Sep;116(3):517-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.029.
Chinese herbal medicine has a long history of human use. A novel herbal formula, anti-asthma herbal medicine intervention (ASHMI), has been shown to be an effective therapy in a murine model of allergic asthma.
This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy, safety, and immunomodulatory effects of ASHMI treatment in patients with moderate-severe, persistent asthma with prednisone therapy.
In a double-blind trial, 91 subjects underwent randomization. Forty-five subjects received oral ASHMI capsules and prednisone placebo tablets (ASHMI group) and 46 subjects received oral prednisone tablets and ASHMI placebo capsules (prednisone group) for 4 weeks. Spirometry measurements; symptom scores; side effects; and serum cortisol, cytokine, and IgE levels were evaluated before and after treatment.
Posttreatment lung function was significantly improved in both groups as shown by increased FEV(1) and peak expiratory flow findings (P<.001). The improvement was slightly but significantly greater in the prednisone group (P<.05). Clinical symptom scores, use of beta(2)-bronchodilators, and serum IgE levels were reduced significantly, and to a similar degree in both groups (P<.001). T(H)2 cytokine levels were significantly reduced in both treated groups (P<.001) and were lower in the prednisone-treated group (P<.05). Serum IFN-gamma and cortisol levels were significantly decreased in the prednisone group (P<.001) but significantly increased in the ASHMI group (P<.001). No severe side effects were observed in either group.
Anti-asthma herbal medicine intervention appears to be a safe and effective alternative medicine for treating asthma. In contrast with prednisone, ASHMI had no adverse effect on adrenal function and had a beneficial effect on T(H)1 and T(H)2 balance.
中草药在人类使用方面有着悠久的历史。一种新型草药配方,抗哮喘草药干预(ASHMI),已被证明在过敏性哮喘小鼠模型中是一种有效的治疗方法。
本研究旨在比较ASHMI治疗与泼尼松治疗对中重度持续性哮喘患者的疗效、安全性和免疫调节作用。
在一项双盲试验中,91名受试者进行了随机分组。45名受试者接受口服ASHMI胶囊和泼尼松安慰剂片(ASHMI组),46名受试者接受口服泼尼松片和ASHMI安慰剂胶囊(泼尼松组),为期4周。在治疗前后评估肺功能测定、症状评分、副作用以及血清皮质醇、细胞因子和IgE水平。
两组治疗后肺功能均显著改善,表现为第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)增加和呼气峰值流速结果(P<0.001)。泼尼松组的改善略有但显著更大(P<0.05)。两组的临床症状评分、β₂ - 支气管扩张剂的使用和血清IgE水平均显著降低,且降低程度相似(P<0.001)。两个治疗组的辅助性T细胞2(Th2)细胞因子水平均显著降低(P<0.001),且泼尼松治疗组更低(P<0.05)。泼尼松组的血清干扰素 - γ(IFN - γ)和皮质醇水平显著降低(P<0.001),而ASHMI组显著升高(P<0.001)。两组均未观察到严重副作用。
抗哮喘草药干预似乎是一种治疗哮喘的安全有效的替代药物。与泼尼松相比,ASHMI对肾上腺功能没有不良影响,并且对Th1和Th2平衡有有益作用。