Suppr超能文献

机械通气期间的气道湿化。对气管支气管纤毛细胞形态的影响。

Airways humidification during mechanical ventilation. Effects on tracheobronchial ciliated cells morphology.

作者信息

Cinnella G, Giardina C, Fischetti A, Lecce G, Fiore M G, Serio G, Carravetta G, Dambrosio M, Fiore T

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Foggia-Maternity Hospital, Via IV Novembre 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):585-93.

Abstract

AIM

Airways humidification during mechanical ventilation (MV) can be performed by means of heat and moisture exchangers (HME). Good performance of selected hygroscopic HME was shown in terms of tracheal temperature and humidity control and low tube obstruction rates. However, few data are available on their effects on tracheobronchial ciliated cells. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2 different HME on ciliated cell during MV.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery lasting <4 h were randomly assigned to be treated with Rusch (Group 1) or Mediflux (Group 2) hygroscopic HME. The morphology of tracheobronchial ciliated cells was evaluated from cytologic smears of endotracheal aspirate. Smears were prepared by using the thin-prep processor, stained using the Papanicolau method and examined in triplicate: recognizable respiratory cells were graded on a six-point scale, according to the normal appearance of cilia, cytoplasm and nucleus.

RESULTS

In Group 1, 178.3+37 cells were retrieved from aspirates and , 155.6+58 in Group 2 (NS). The score was 739+241 in Group 1 and 617+329 in Group 2 (NS). Cilia and end plate were undamaged in 80+17% and 81+20% cells respectively in Group 1 and in 56+23% and 62+22% cells respectively in Group 2 (P<0.01 and <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

During MV epithelial tracheobronchial cells can be affected by the humidification device used. Our findings suggest that the 2 HME tested in the present study have a different impact on ciliated cells structure.

摘要

目的

机械通气(MV)期间的气道湿化可通过热湿交换器(HME)来实现。所选吸湿型HME在气管温度和湿度控制以及低导管阻塞率方面表现良好。然而,关于它们对气管支气管纤毛细胞影响的数据很少。本研究的目的是评估两种不同的HME在MV期间对纤毛细胞的影响。

方法

连续20例接受持续时间<4小时择期手术的患者被随机分配接受Rusch(第1组)或Mediflux(第2组)吸湿型HME治疗。通过气管内吸出物的细胞学涂片评估气管支气管纤毛细胞的形态。涂片采用薄层制片仪制备,用巴氏染色法染色,并进行三次检查:根据纤毛、细胞质和细胞核的正常外观,将可识别的呼吸细胞按六点量表分级。

结果

在第1组中,从吸出物中获取178.3±37个细胞,第2组为155.6±58个细胞(无显著性差异)。第1组的评分为739±241,第2组为617±329(无显著性差异)。第1组分别有80±17%和81±20%的细胞纤毛和终板未受损,第2组分别为56±23%和62±22%的细胞(P<0.01和<0.05)。

结论

在MV期间,气管支气管上皮细胞可能会受到所用湿化装置的影响。我们的研究结果表明,本研究中测试的两种HME对纤毛细胞结构有不同的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验