Suppr超能文献

两种基于教会的干预措施对参加医疗补助计划的拉丁裔女性乳腺癌筛查率的影响。

The effect of two church-based interventions on breast cancer screening rates among Medicaid-insured Latinas.

作者信息

Welsh Adrienne L, Sauaia Angela, Jacobellis Jillian, Min Sung-joon, Byers Tim

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 13611 East Colfax Ave, Suite 100, Aurora, CO 80011.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Oct;2(4):A07. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Latinas face disparities in cancer screening rates compared with non-Latina whites. The Tepeyac Project aims to reduce these disparities by using a church-based approach to increase breast cancer screening among Latinas in Colorado. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of two Tepeyac Project interventions on the mammogram rates of Latinas and non-Latina whites enrolled in the Medicaid fee-for-service program.

METHODS

Two intervention groups were compared: 209 churches in Colorado that received educational printed materials in Spanish and English (the printed statewide intervention) and four churches in the Denver area that received personalized education from promotoras, or peer counselors (the promotora intervention), in addition to the printed statewide intervention. Biennial Medicaid mammogram claim rates in Colorado before the interventions (1998-1999) and after (2000-2001) were used to compare the effect of the interventions on mammogram use among Latinas and non-Latina whites aged 50 to 64 years who were enrolled in the Medicaid fee-for-service program. Adjusted rates were computed using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Small, nonsignificant increases in screening were observed among Latinas exposed to the promotora intervention (from 25% at baseline to 30% at follow-up [P = .30]) as compared with 45% at baseline and 43% at follow-up for the printed statewide intervention (P = .27). Screening among non-Latina whites increased by 6% in the promotora intervention area (from 32% at baseline to 38% at follow-up [P = .40]) and by 3% in the printed statewide intervention (from 41% at baseline to 44% at follow-up [P = .02]). No significant disparities in breast cancer screening were detected between Latinas and non-Latina whites. After adjustment for the confounders by generalized estimating equations, the promotora intervention had a marginally greater impact than the printed statewide intervention in increasing mammogram use among Latinas (generalized estimating equation, P = .07).

CONCLUSION

A personalized community-based education was only modestly effective in increasing breast cancer screening among Medicaid-insured Latinas. Education alone may not be the answer for this population. The barriers for these Medicaid enrollees must be investigated so that interventions can be tailored to address their needs.

摘要

引言

与非拉丁裔白人相比,拉丁裔女性在癌症筛查率方面存在差异。特佩亚克项目旨在通过采用基于教会的方法来提高科罗拉多州拉丁裔女性的乳腺癌筛查率,以减少这些差异。本研究的目的是比较特佩亚克项目的两种干预措施对参加医疗补助按服务收费计划的拉丁裔和非拉丁裔白人乳房X光检查率的影响。

方法

比较两个干预组:科罗拉多州的209所教堂,这些教堂收到了西班牙语和英语的教育印刷材料(全州印刷干预);以及丹佛地区的四所教堂,除了全州印刷干预外,还接受了由健康促进员或同伴咨询师提供的个性化教育(健康促进员干预)。使用干预前(1998 - 1999年)和干预后(2000 - 2001年)科罗拉多州医疗补助乳房X光检查的两年期报销率,来比较干预措施对参加医疗补助按服务收费计划的50至64岁拉丁裔和非拉丁裔白人乳房X光检查使用率的影响。使用广义估计方程计算调整后的比率。

结果

与全州印刷干预相比,接受健康促进员干预的拉丁裔女性筛查率有小幅、不显著的增加(从基线时的25%增至随访时的30% [P = 0.30]),而全州印刷干预的基线时为45%,随访时为43% [P = 0.27])。在健康促进员干预地区,非拉丁裔白人的筛查率增加了6%(从基线时的32%增至随访时的38% [P = 0.40]),在全州印刷干预中增加了3%(从基线时的41%增至随访时的44% [P = 0.02])。未检测到拉丁裔和非拉丁裔白人在乳腺癌筛查方面存在显著差异。通过广义估计方程对混杂因素进行调整后,在增加拉丁裔女性乳房X光检查使用率方面,健康促进员干预比全州印刷干预的影响略大(广义估计方程,P = 0.07)。

结论

基于社区的个性化教育在提高参加医疗补助的拉丁裔女性乳腺癌筛查率方面效果有限。仅靠教育可能无法解决这一人群的问题。必须调查这些医疗补助参保者面临的障碍,以便能够针对性地制定干预措施来满足他们的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3e/1435704/273821e2ebd3/PCD24A07s01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验