Bromley Elizabeth
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Schizophr Bull. 2005 Oct;31(4):954-61. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi059. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
In 2002, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) initiated a multistakeholder research process designed to stimulate the development and evaluation of medications targeting the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. The first phase, Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS), sought consensus on laboratory measures for cognition, clinical trial outcome measures, and drug registration requirements. MATRICS constitutes a unique drug development model because it targeted a specific endophenotype of schizophrenia and because it engaged academic, industry, and government stakeholders in a consensus-oriented process. This study offers a preliminary qualitative evaluation of the NIMH-MATRICS project.
Interview data are used to describe how MATRICS participants regard 3 aspects of the development of cognitive medications: the definition of the treatment target, stakeholders' role in the early development process, and anticipated dissemination complexities.
MATRICS participants describe the treatment target in highly varied ways and envision a wide range of public health benefits. MATRICS is perceived as inclusive, despite minimal representation from some end users. According to informants, clinical detection, documentation, and monitoring of cognition and functioning may prove problematic. More thoroughly than non-industry-employed informants, industry-employed MATRICS participants articulate strategies by which treatments can be integrated into clinical practice.
The MATRICS process did not produce a clinical concept of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, and significant challenges remain to be addressed regarding the rational clinical use of novel pharmaceuticals for cognition. Broader inclusion of end users in translational science projects may streamline implementation and facilitate improvements in real-world outcomes.
2002年,美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)启动了一个多方利益相关者参与的研究过程,旨在推动针对精神分裂症相关认知缺陷的药物研发与评估。第一阶段是精神分裂症认知改善测量与治疗研究(MATRICS),旨在就认知的实验室测量方法、临床试验结果测量指标以及药物注册要求达成共识。MATRICS构成了一种独特的药物研发模式,因为它针对精神分裂症的特定内表型,并且让学术界、产业界和政府利益相关者参与到一个以达成共识为导向的过程中。本研究对NIMH - MATRICS项目进行了初步的定性评估。
访谈数据用于描述MATRICS参与者对认知药物研发三个方面的看法:治疗靶点的定义、利益相关者在早期研发过程中的作用以及预期的推广复杂性。
MATRICS参与者对治疗靶点的描述方式高度多样,并设想了广泛的公共卫生益处。尽管一些最终用户的代表性不足,但MATRICS被认为具有包容性。据受访者称,认知和功能的临床检测、记录及监测可能存在问题。与非行业从业者受访者相比,行业从业者MATRICS参与者更全面地阐述了将治疗方法整合到临床实践中的策略。
MATRICS过程并未产生精神分裂症认知障碍的临床概念,在合理临床使用新型认知药物方面仍有重大挑战有待解决。在转化科学项目中更广泛地纳入最终用户可能会简化实施过程,并有助于改善实际效果。