Suppr超能文献

[采用其他组织学技术对最初革兰氏染色、吉姆萨染色和沃辛-斯塔里染色法检测结果为阴性的儿童进行幽门螺杆菌检测]

[Helicobacter pylori detection in children with initially negative Gram, Giemsa and Wharting-Starry methods, using other histologic techniques].

作者信息

Ortiz-Martínez Miguel Angel, Salazar-Váldez Olga Ruth L, Brito-Zurita Olga Rosa, Abundis-Castro Leticia, García-Bajeca Claudia, Gutiérrez-López Shelma J, Jacobo-Peña Alejandra

机构信息

Médico adscrito al Departamento de Anatomía Patológica del Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Centro Medico Nacional del Noroeste. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Cd. Obregón, Sonora, México.

出版信息

Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2005 Apr-Jun;70(2):143-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify Helicobacter pylori by Gram, Giemsa and Warthing-Starry histological staining methods in biopsies of the digestive tract in children, when Helicobacter pylori identification was negative with hematoxilin and eosin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective, cross-sectional and comparative study of 36 gastric biopsies received in the department of Anatomic-Pathology, in a period often months. All the biopsies were initially stained with routine Hematoxilin and Eosin. Of the 36 biopsies, 24 were negative to Helicobacter pylori. From paraffin blocks of these last biopsies three new histological sections were obtained to dye them with Gram, Giemsa and Warthing-Starry, and two medical pathologists performed the microscopic interpretation of these samples.

RESULTS

The search for Helicobacter pylori was carried out in 24 initially negative biopsies, one was positive for Gram (4.16%) and negative for Giemsa and Warthing-Starry and four were both positive for Giemsa and Warthing-Starry (16.66%) and both were also negative for Gram. Only one biopsy was positive for the three methods. The remaining samples were negative for the three stains.

CONCLUSION

The Giemsa and/or Warthing-Starry histologic techniques can be a more specific alternative for the determination of Helicobacter pylori in patients with negative digestive tract biopsies with the traditional method of hematoxilin and eosin.

摘要

目的

当苏木精-伊红染色法鉴定幽门螺杆菌呈阴性时,采用革兰氏染色、吉姆萨染色和沃辛-斯塔里组织学染色法对儿童消化道活检组织中的幽门螺杆菌进行鉴定。

材料与方法

我们对解剖病理学部门在十个月内接收的36份胃活检组织进行了一项回顾性、横断面和对比性研究。所有活检组织最初均采用常规苏木精-伊红染色。在这36份活检组织中,24份幽门螺杆菌检测呈阴性。从这些最后活检组织的石蜡块中获取三个新的组织学切片,分别用革兰氏染色、吉姆萨染色和沃辛-斯塔里染色,两名医学病理学家对这些样本进行显微镜检查解读。

结果

对24份最初检测呈阴性的活检组织进行幽门螺杆菌检测,其中一份革兰氏染色呈阳性(4.16%),吉姆萨染色和沃辛-斯塔里染色呈阴性,四份吉姆萨染色和沃辛-斯塔里染色均呈阳性(16.66%),革兰氏染色呈阴性。只有一份活检组织三种方法检测均呈阳性。其余样本三种染色均呈阴性。

结论

对于采用传统苏木精-伊红方法检测消化道活检组织呈阴性结果的患者,吉姆萨染色和/或沃辛-斯塔里组织学技术可能是一种更具特异性的检测幽门螺杆菌的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验