Laberge L, Gagnon C, Jean S, Mathieu J
Unité de recherche clinique, Complexe hospitalier de la Sagamie, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada, G7H 5H6.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;76(10):1403-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.043455.
To assess the reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Daytime Sleepiness Scale (DSS), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS), and Krupp's Fatigue Severity Scale (KFSS) in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).
In total, 27 patients with DM1 were administered the questionnaires on two occasions, with a 2 week interval. Internal consistency and test retest reliability were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Cronbach's alpha, Cohen's kappa, and Goodman-Kruskal's gamma coefficients.
Internal consistency of the CFS and KFSS were adequate (alpha > 0.70) but that of the ESS was weak (alpha = 0.24). Both daytime sleepiness and fatigue rating scales showed significant test retest reliability. Test retest reliability for individual items revealed inconsistencies for some ESS and CFS items.
Reliability of the CFS, DSS, and KFSS was high, allowing their use for individual patients with DM1, but that of the ESS was lower, rendering its current usage in DM1 questionable. Fatigue rating scales such as the KFSS, which are based on the behavioural consequences of fatigue, may constitute a more accurate and comprehensive measure of fatigue severity in the DM1 population.
评估爱泼沃斯思睡量表(ESS)、日间嗜睡量表(DSS)、查尔德疲劳量表(CFS)及克虏伯疲劳严重程度量表(KFSS)在1型强直性肌营养不良(DM1)患者中的可靠性。
共27例DM1患者,分两次进行问卷调查,间隔2周。采用组内相关系数(ICC)、克朗巴哈系数、科恩系数及古德曼-克鲁斯卡尔系数测量内部一致性及重测信度。
CFS和KFSS的内部一致性良好(α>0.70),而ESS的内部一致性较弱(α=0.24)。日间嗜睡量表和疲劳评定量表均显示出显著的重测信度。各项目的重测信度显示,部分ESS和CFS项目存在不一致性。
CFS、DSS和KFSS的可靠性较高,可用于个体DM1患者,但ESS的可靠性较低,其目前在DM1中的应用存在疑问。基于疲劳行为后果的KFSS等疲劳评定量表,可能是DM1人群中更准确、全面的疲劳严重程度测量方法。