Trull Timothy J
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, 106C McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
J Pers Disord. 2005 Jun;19(3):262-82. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.262.
Two major challenges that must be addressed by dimensional models, if they are to be considered viable alternatives to the present categorical system for diagnosing personality disorders, involve the issues of coverage and cutoffs. Several dimensional models of personality and personality pathology are evaluated with these issues in mind. There is growing consensus for the relevance of at least four higher-order domains of personality functioning that are clearly related to personality pathology: neuroticism/negative affectivity/emotional dysregulation, extraversion/positive emotionality, dissocial/antagonistic behavior, and constraint/compulsivity/conscientiousness. A proposal for developing a dimensionally based diagnostic system for personality disorders incorporating these higher-order traits is offered.
如果维度模型要被视为当前人格障碍分类系统的可行替代方案,那么它们必须应对的两个主要挑战涉及覆盖范围和临界值问题。在考虑到这些问题的情况下,对几种人格和人格病理学的维度模型进行了评估。对于至少四个与人格病理学明显相关的人格功能高阶领域的相关性,人们的共识越来越高:神经质/消极情感/情绪失调、外向性/积极情感、反社会/敌对行为以及约束性/强迫性/尽责性。本文提出了一个基于维度的人格障碍诊断系统的开发建议,该系统纳入了这些高阶特质。