Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116, USA.
J Pers Disord. 2013 Jun;27(3):270-95. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.270.
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that personality pathology is, at its core, fundamentally interpersonal. The authors review the proposed DSM-5 Section 3 redefinition of personality pathology involving self and interpersonal dysfunction, which they regard as a substantial improvement over the DSM-IV (and Section 2) definition. They note similarities between the proposed scheme and contemporary interpersonal theory and interpret the Section 3 definition using the underlying assumptions and evidence base of the interpersonal paradigm in clinical psychology. The authors describe how grounding the proposed Section 3 definition in interpersonal theory, and in particular a focus on the "interpersonal situation," adds to its theoretical texture, empirical support, and clinical utility. They provide a clinical example that demonstrates the ability of contemporary interpersonal theory to augment the definition of personality pathology. The authors conclude with directions for further research that could clarify the core of personality pathology, and how interpersonal theory can inform research aimed at enhancing the Section 3 proposal and ultimately justify its migration to Section 2.
本文旨在论证人格障碍的核心本质上是人际性的。作者回顾了 DSM-5 第 3 节中提出的人格障碍重新定义,包括自我和人际功能障碍,他们认为这相对于 DSM-IV(和第 2 节)的定义有了很大的改进。他们注意到所提出的方案与当代人际理论之间的相似之处,并使用临床心理学中人际范式的基本假设和证据基础来解释第 3 节的定义。作者描述了如何将所提出的第 3 节定义建立在人际理论基础上,特别是关注“人际情境”,如何增加其理论结构、实证支持和临床实用性。他们提供了一个临床示例,展示了当代人际理论增强人格障碍定义的能力。作者最后提出了进一步研究的方向,这可能有助于阐明人格障碍的核心问题,以及人际理论如何为旨在增强第 3 节提案并最终使其迁移到第 2 节的研究提供信息。