Samuel Douglas B, Widiger Thomas A
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1326-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
Theory and research have suggested that the personality disorders contained within the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) can be understood as maladaptive variants of the personality traits included within the five-factor model (FFM). The current meta-analysis of FFM personality disorder research both replicated and extended the 2004 work of Saulsman and Page (The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085) through a facet level analysis that provides a more specific and nuanced description of each DSM-IV-TR personality disorder. The empirical FFM profiles generated for each personality disorder were generally congruent at the facet level with hypothesized FFM translations of the DSM-IV-TR personality disorders. However, notable exceptions to the hypotheses did occur and even some findings that were consistent with FFM theory could be said to be instrument specific.
理论和研究表明，美国精神病学协会《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》（DSM-IV-TR）中包含的人格障碍可被理解为五因素模型（FFM）中所包含人格特质的适应不良变体。当前对FFM人格障碍研究的元分析，通过一个层面水平分析，既重复又扩展了索尔兹曼和佩奇2004年的研究工作（《五因素模型与人格障碍实证文献：一项元分析综述》。《临床心理学评论》，23，1055 - 1085），该分析为每种DSM-IV-TR人格障碍提供了更具体、更细致入微的描述。为每种人格障碍生成的实证FFM概况在层面水平上总体上与DSM-IV-TR人格障碍的假设FFM翻译一致。然而，假设也确实存在显著例外，甚至一些与FFM理论一致的发现也可以说是特定于工具的。
