Moran C, Gillon G
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Science, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Brain Inj. 2005 Sep;19(10):743-51. doi: 10.1080/02699050500110199.
This study investigated inference comprehension performance in adolescents who had suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Using stimuli adapted from Lehman-Blake and Tompkins, participants listened to short paragraphs that varied according to the working memory demands of the task and answered comprehension questions that required inferences to be generated. Six adolescents, aged 12-16 years, who had suffered a TBI prior to the age of 10 years, were assessed and their performance was compared to six individually age-matched peers with typical development. Analysis revealed that individuals with TBI did not differ from non-injured peers in their understanding of inferences when the storage demands of the task were minimized. However, when storage demands were high, adolescents with TBI performed poorly compared to their age-matched peers. Results are discussed relative to a working-memory hypothesis of impairment following TBI.
本研究调查了遭受创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的青少年的推理理解能力。参与者使用改编自莱曼 - 布莱克和汤普金斯的刺激材料,听根据任务工作记忆需求而变化的短段落,并回答需要进行推理的理解问题。对6名12 - 16岁、10岁之前遭受过TBI的青少年进行了评估,并将他们的表现与6名年龄匹配、发育正常的同龄人进行比较。分析表明,当任务的存储需求最小化时,TBI患者在推理理解方面与未受伤的同龄人没有差异。然而,当存储需求较高时,患有TBI的青少年与年龄匹配的同龄人相比表现较差。研究结果结合TBI后损伤的工作记忆假说进行了讨论。