Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉瘤支架植入术中的辐射暴露。

Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Geijer H, Larzon T, Popek R, Beckman K-W

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Orebro University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2005 Oct;78(934):906-12. doi: 10.1259/bjr/72629938.

Abstract

In recent years, endovascular stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become more and more common. The radiation dose associated with these procedures is not well documented however. The aim of the present study was to estimate the radiation exposure and to simulate the effects of a switch from C-arm radiographic equipment to a dedicated angiographic suite. Dose-area product (DAP) was recorded for 24 aortic stent-grafting procedures. Based on these data, entrance surface dose (ESD) and effective dose were calculated. A simulation of doses at various settings was also performed using a humanoid Alderson phantom. The image quality was evaluated with a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom. The mean DAP was 72.3 Gy cm(2) at 28 min fluoroscopy time with a mean ESD of 0.39 Gy and a mean effective dose of 10.5 mSv. If the procedures had been performed in an angiographic suite, all dose values would be much higher with a mean ESD of 2.9 Gy with 16 patients exceeding 2 Gy, which is considered to be a threshold for possible skin injury. The image quality for fluoroscopy was superior for the C-arm whilst the angiographic unit gave better acquisition images. Using a C-arm unit resulted in doses similar to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). If the same patients had been treated using dedicated angiographic equipment, the risk of skin injury would be much higher. It is thus important to be aware of the dose output of the equipment that is used.

摘要

近年来,腹主动脉瘤的血管内支架植入术越来越普遍。然而,与这些手术相关的辐射剂量尚无充分记录。本研究的目的是估计辐射暴露情况,并模拟从C形臂X射线摄影设备切换到专用血管造影套件的效果。记录了24例主动脉支架植入手术的剂量面积乘积(DAP)。基于这些数据,计算了体表入射剂量(ESD)和有效剂量。还使用人形Alderson体模对各种设置下的剂量进行了模拟。使用CDRAD对比细节体模评估图像质量。在28分钟的透视时间内,平均DAP为72.3 Gy cm²,平均ESD为0.39 Gy,平均有效剂量为10.5 mSv。如果这些手术在血管造影套件中进行,所有剂量值都会高得多,平均ESD为2.9 Gy,16名患者超过2 Gy,这被认为是可能导致皮肤损伤的阈值。C形臂的透视图像质量更好,而血管造影设备的采集图像更好。使用C形臂设备导致的剂量与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相似。如果使用专用血管造影设备治疗相同的患者,皮肤损伤的风险会高得多。因此,了解所使用设备的剂量输出非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验