Suppr超能文献

[单点法与多点法在乳腺癌雌激素受体和孕激素受体测定中的对比研究]

[Comparative study of single-point method and multipoint method in the measurement of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor in breast cancer].

作者信息

Shen X Q

机构信息

Cancer Institute, Zhejiang Medical University, Hangzhou.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1992 Mar;14(2):112-5.

PMID:1618078
Abstract

A comparative study of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) by single-point method and multi-point method in dextran coated charcoal assay (DCC) was carried out in 50 and 47 cases of breast cancer, respectively. Taking 10 fmol/mg protein as the positive value, the conformation rate of both methods in ER measurement was 96.0% (48/50) with r = 0.978 by linear regression analysis (P less than 0.001). In PgR measurement, the conformation rate of both methods was 95.7% with r = 0.988 (P less than 0.001). Statistically, the difference between single-point method and multi-point method in the ER and PgR measurements was not significant (P greater than 0.5) both in rank-sum test and in paired t-test. The authors suggest that ER and PgR of breast cancer samples be measured with single-point method for its simplicity and less tumor tissue required.

摘要

分别对50例和47例乳腺癌患者采用葡聚糖包被活性炭法(DCC)的单点法和多点法进行雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PgR)的比较研究。以10 fmol/mg蛋白作为阳性值,两种方法在ER测定中的符合率均为96.0%(48/50),线性回归分析显示r = 0.978(P<0.001)。在PgR测定中,两种方法的符合率为95.7%,r = 0.988(P<0.001)。统计学上,在秩和检验及配对t检验中,单点法和多点法在ER和PgR测定中的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.5)。作者建议采用单点法测定乳腺癌样本的ER和PgR,因其操作简单且所需肿瘤组织较少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验