Surles Richard C
Comprehensive NeuroScience Inc., 21 Bloomingdale Road, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Sep;11(8 Suppl):S248-53.
In every state across America, Medicaid programs are under serious budgetary pressure. The need to contain costs has led to various forms of restriction in the coverage for drug therapy, including psychiatric pharmacotherapy. Compared with conventional antipsychotic drugs, the atypical agents have higher acquisition costs but offer greater tolerability. Thus, the atypicals are widely accepted as first-line therapy for patients with schizophrenia, and they are also now being recognized for their efficacy in treating bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, the atypicals carry their own characteristic adverse effects, of which weight gain is among the most distressing, with the potential to interfere with compliance to treatment. Treatment compliance is crucial in terms of clinical outcome as well as cost containment, as inadequate compliance is clearly associated with a higher risk of relapse requiring costly rehospitalization. Therefore, antipsychotic therapy that is individually tailored to the patient's needs and thereby improves compliance may be more cost effective than restrictive drug coverage policies based only on acquisition costs. Conversely, individualization of pharmacotherapy is not feasible if some or all of the atypical antipsychotics are excluded from coverage.
在美国的每个州,医疗补助计划都面临着严重的预算压力。控制成本的需求导致了药物治疗(包括精神科药物治疗)覆盖范围的各种形式的限制。与传统抗精神病药物相比,非典型药物的购置成本更高,但耐受性更好。因此,非典型药物被广泛接受为精神分裂症患者的一线治疗药物,它们在治疗双相情感障碍方面的疗效也正在得到认可。然而,非典型药物有其自身特有的不良反应,其中体重增加是最令人苦恼的不良反应之一,有可能干扰治疗依从性。治疗依从性在临床结果和成本控制方面都至关重要,因为依从性不足显然与复发风险较高相关,而复发需要昂贵的再次住院治疗。因此,根据患者需求进行个性化定制从而提高依从性的抗精神病治疗可能比仅基于购置成本的限制性药物覆盖政策更具成本效益。相反,如果部分或全部非典型抗精神病药物被排除在覆盖范围之外,药物治疗的个体化就不可行。