Hartung Daniel M, Wisdom Jennifer P, Pollack David A, Hamer Ann M, Haxby Dean G, Middleton Luke, McFarland Bentson H
Oregon State University, Portland, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;69(10):1540-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n1003.
To examine a cohort of Medicaid patients with new prescriptions for atypical antipsychotic medication to determine the prevalence of subtherapeutic atypical antipsychotic medication use and to identify patient and prescribing provider characteristics associated with occurrence of subtherapeutic use.
This observational cohort study examined Medicaid administrative claims data for patients aged 20 to 64 years with a new prescription for an atypical antipsychotic medication (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone) between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004. Patient diagnostic information was identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes on submitted medical claims. Patient characteristics, prescribing provider characteristics, length of therapy, and dosing were examined. A logistic regression assessed the probability of subtherapeutic dosing.
Among 830 individuals in our sample who began treatment with an atypical antipsychotic, only 15% had a documented diagnosis of schizophrenia, subtherapeutic dosing was common (up to 86% of patients taking quetiapine), and 40% continued less than 30 days with the index prescription. A logistic model indicated that a general practitioner as prescribing provider, length of therapy equal to or less than 30 days, and prescription of quetiapine were significantly associated with a subtherapeutic dose (p < .001, p = .028, and p < .001, respectively).
These results suggest that there is extensive use of expensive atypical antipsychotic medications for off-label purposes such as sedation or for other practice patterns that should be explored further. Approaches that minimize off-label atypical antipsychotic use could be of considerable value to Medicaid programs. In addition, these findings support the need for the introduction or increased use of utilization monitoring and the implementation of medication practice guidelines as appropriate decision support for prescribing providers.
对一组新开非典型抗精神病药物处方的医疗补助患者进行调查,以确定非治疗性使用非典型抗精神病药物的发生率,并确定与非治疗性使用发生相关的患者和开处方医生的特征。
这项观察性队列研究检查了2004年1月1日至2004年12月31日期间年龄在20至64岁、新开非典型抗精神病药物(氯氮平、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮、齐拉西酮)处方的医疗补助患者的行政索赔数据。使用提交的医疗索赔上的《国际疾病分类,第九修订本,临床修订版》代码确定患者诊断信息。检查了患者特征、开处方医生特征、治疗时长和剂量。进行逻辑回归分析以评估非治疗性给药的概率。
在我们样本中开始使用非典型抗精神病药物治疗的830人中,只有15%有记录诊断为精神分裂症,非治疗性给药很常见(服用喹硫平的患者中高达86%),40%的患者使用索引处方持续时间少于30天。逻辑模型表明,作为开处方医生的全科医生、治疗时长等于或少于30天以及喹硫平处方与非治疗性剂量显著相关(分别为p <.001、p =.028和p <.001)。
这些结果表明,昂贵的非典型抗精神病药物被广泛用于如镇静等未标明的用途或其他应进一步探索的治疗模式。尽量减少非典型抗精神病药物未标明用途使用的方法可能对医疗补助计划具有相当大的价值。此外,这些发现支持引入或增加使用利用监测以及实施药物治疗实践指南作为开处方医生的适当决策支持的必要性。