• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国成年肝细胞癌患者的肝移植:尸体供肝肝移植与活体供肝肝移植的比较

Liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: comparison between cadaveric donor and living donor liver transplantations.

作者信息

Hwang Shin, Lee Sung-Gyu, Joh Jae-Won, Suh Kyung-Suk, Kim Dong-Goo

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2005 Oct;11(10):1265-72. doi: 10.1002/lt.20549.

DOI:10.1002/lt.20549
PMID:16184545
Abstract

Current selection criteria of liver transplantation (LT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were derived from the outcomes of cadaveric donor LT (CDLT). We tried to assess the applicability of such criteria to living donor LT (LDLT) through a comparative study between CDLT and LDLT. We analyzed the outcomes of 312 HCC patients who underwent LT at 4 Korean institutions during 1992 to 2002. There were no gross differences of tumor characteristics between CDLT group (n = 75) and LDLT group (n = 237). Overall 3-year survival rate (3-YSR) was 61.1% after CDLT and 73.2% after LDLT including 38 cases of perioperative mortality. Comparison of HCC recurrence curves did not reveal any statistical difference between these 2 groups. Patient survival period till 50% mortality after HCC recurrence was 11 months after CDLT and 7 months after LDLT. Significant risk factors for HCC recurrence were alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, microvascular invasion, gross major vessel invasion, bilateral tumor distribution, and histologic differentiation in the LDLT group on univariate analysis, and tumor size, gross major vessel invasion, and histologic differentiation on multivariate analysis. Milan criteria were met in 70.4%: Their 3-YSR was 89.9% after CDLT and 91.4% after LDLT with exclusion of perioperative mortality. University of California San Francisco criteria were met in 77.7%: Their 3-YSR was 88.1% after CDLT and 90.6% after LDLT. In conclusion, we think that currently available selection criteria for HCC patients can be applicable to LDLT without change of prognostic power.

摘要

目前肝细胞癌(HCC)患者肝移植(LT)的选择标准源自尸体供肝肝移植(CDLT)的结果。我们试图通过CDLT与活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)的对比研究来评估这些标准对LDLT的适用性。我们分析了1992年至2002年期间在4家韩国机构接受LT的312例HCC患者的结果。CDLT组(n = 75)和LDLT组(n = 237)之间的肿瘤特征没有显著差异。CDLT后的总体3年生存率(3 - YSR)为61.1%,LDLT后的为73.2%,包括38例围手术期死亡病例。HCC复发曲线的比较未显示这两组之间有任何统计学差异。HCC复发后直至50%患者死亡的生存时间,CDLT后为11个月,LDLT后为7个月。单因素分析显示,LDLT组中HCC复发的显著危险因素为甲胎蛋白水平、肿瘤大小、微血管侵犯、大体主要血管侵犯、双侧肿瘤分布和组织学分化,多因素分析显示为肿瘤大小、大体主要血管侵犯和组织学分化。70.4%的患者符合米兰标准:排除围手术期死亡病例后,CDLT后的3 - YSR为89.9%,LDLT后的为91.4%。77.7%的患者符合加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校标准:CDLT后的3 - YSR为88.1%,LDLT后的为90.6%。总之,我们认为目前可用的HCC患者选择标准可适用于LDLT,且预后能力不变。

相似文献

1
Liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: comparison between cadaveric donor and living donor liver transplantations.韩国成年肝细胞癌患者的肝移植:尸体供肝肝移植与活体供肝肝移植的比较
Liver Transpl. 2005 Oct;11(10):1265-72. doi: 10.1002/lt.20549.
2
Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation for early irresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.活体供体与尸体供体肝移植治疗早期不可切除肝细胞癌
Br J Surg. 2007 Jan;94(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5528.
3
Living-donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的活体肝移植
Transplantation. 2003 Feb 15;75(3 Suppl):S37-40. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000047029.02806.16.
4
Expanded indication criteria of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma at one large-volume center.某大型医疗中心肝细胞癌活体肝移植扩大适应症标准
Liver Transpl. 2008 Jul;14(7):935-45. doi: 10.1002/lt.21445.
5
Can we expand the Milan criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma in living donor liver transplantation?我们能否扩大活体肝移植中肝细胞癌的米兰标准?
Transplant Proc. 2004 Oct;36(8):2289-90. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.144.
6
HCC in living donor liver transplantation: can we expand the Milan criteria?活体供肝肝移植中的肝细胞癌:我们能否扩大米兰标准?
Dig Dis. 2007;25(4):313-9. doi: 10.1159/000106911.
7
The role of living-donor liver transplantation in surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.活体肝移植在肝细胞癌外科治疗中的作用。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(2):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-1018-8.
8
Multimodality tumor control and living donor transplantation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.不可切除肝细胞癌的多模式肿瘤控制与活体供体移植
Transplant Proc. 2004 Oct;36(8):2287-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.035.
9
Living donor liver transplantation of the right lobe for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a European center.欧洲某中心针对肝硬化合并肝细胞癌患者进行的活体供体右半肝肝移植手术
Liver Transpl. 2007 Jun;13(6):896-903. doi: 10.1002/lt.21189.
10
Prospective study on the outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma registered for living donor liver transplantation: how long can they wait?前瞻性研究登记接受活体肝移植的肝细胞癌患者的结局:他们可以等待多长时间?
Transplantation. 2010 Mar 27;89(6):650-4. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181cd4ae9.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocelluler carcinoma from living donor versus deceased donor within University of Southern California San Francisco criteria: a report from Turkey.按照南加州大学旧金山标准比较活体供体与尸体供体肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的疗效:来自土耳其的一份报告
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 22;14:1419740. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1419740. eCollection 2024.
2
Trends of liver transplantation in Asia.亚洲肝脏移植的趋势。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01924-1.
3
Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria: A Specific Role for Living Donor Liver Transplantation after Neoadjuvant Therapy.
米兰标准以外的肝细胞癌肝移植:新辅助治疗后活体肝移植的特殊作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 25;16(5):920. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050920.
4
Estimation of right lobe graft weight for living donor liver transplantation using deep learning-based fully automatic computed tomographic volumetry.基于深度学习的全自动 CT 体绘制技术估算活体肝移植供肝右叶重量。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 18;13(1):17746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45140-0.
5
Can living donor liver transplantation provide similar outcomes to deceased-donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis.活体供肝移植能否为肝细胞癌提供与死体供肝移植相似的结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatol Int. 2023 Feb;17(1):18-37. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10435-3. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Accuracy and Efficiency of Right-Lobe Graft Weight Estimation Using Deep-Learning-Assisted CT Volumetry for Living-Donor Liver Transplantation.深度学习辅助CT容积测量法用于活体肝移植右叶移植物重量估计的准确性和效率
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;12(3):590. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030590.
7
Comparison between Milan and UCSF criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝细胞癌患者肝移植米兰标准与加州大学旧金山分校标准的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan 5;6:11. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.06. eCollection 2021.
8
Increased Surgical Complications but Improved Overall Survival with Adult Living Donor Compared to Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人活体供肝与尸体供肝肝移植相比,手术并发症增加但总体生存率提高:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Aug 24;2020:1320830. doi: 10.1155/2020/1320830. eCollection 2020.
9
Preoperative high-sensitivity troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide, alone and in combination, for risk stratification of mortality after liver transplantation.术前高敏肌钙蛋白 I 和 B 型利钠肽单独及联合用于肝移植术后死亡率的风险分层。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun;74(3):242-253. doi: 10.4097/kja.20296. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin affects the survival of HCC patients with marginal liver function and curative treatment: ACRoS1402.去γ-羧基凝血酶原影响边缘肝功能 HCC 患者的生存和根治性治疗:ACROS1402。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;146(11):2949-2956. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03270-2. Epub 2020 May 27.