• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法医鉴定患者同意参与研究的能力:MacCAT-CR的应用。

Capacity of forensic patients to consent to research: the use of the MacCAT-CR.

作者信息

McDermott Barbara E, Gerbasi Joan B, Quanbeck Cameron, Scott Charles L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Forensic Division, UC Davis School of Medicine, 2230 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):299-307.

PMID:16186191
Abstract

The ability of psychiatric patients and prisoners to provide informed consent to participate in clinical research has given rise to much debate. Forensic psychiatric patients present a particular concern regarding their competence to consent to research, as they are both patients and prisoners. The primary goal of this research was to evaluate whether, by employing structured assessments of capacity to consent to research, we could determine if this combined vulnerability leads to differences in competence from the published abilities of nonforensic psychiatric patients. Subjects deemed incapable of providing informed consent scored differently and lower than the other consent groups on three aspects of the decision-making process. Diagnosis evidenced only a slight relationship to decision-making abilities, and this difference was only in the ability to understand the basic procedural elements of the research. Psychiatric symptoms were modestly related to decision-making. Positive symptoms were associated with poorer performance on the Understanding subscale of the MacCAT-CR, and negative symptoms were associated with lowered performance on the Reasoning subscale. These results are in accord with several published studies of nonforensic psychiatric patients and suggest that concerns regarding both forensic and nonforensic psychiatric patients' ability to provide informed consent may be unwarranted, especially in patients with few active symptoms.

摘要

精神病患者和囚犯参与临床研究时提供知情同意的能力引发了诸多争议。法医精神病患者在同意参与研究的能力方面存在特殊问题,因为他们既是患者又是囚犯。本研究的主要目的是评估通过采用对研究同意能力的结构化评估,我们是否能够确定这种双重脆弱性是否会导致其同意能力与已发表的非法医精神病患者的能力存在差异。被认为无能力提供知情同意的受试者在决策过程的三个方面得分与其他同意组不同且更低。诊断仅与决策能力有轻微关联,且这种差异仅体现在理解研究基本程序要素的能力上。精神症状与决策有一定关联。阳性症状与MacCAT-CR理解子量表上较差的表现相关,阴性症状与推理子量表上较低的表现相关。这些结果与几项已发表的关于非法医精神病患者的研究一致,表明对法医和非法医精神病患者提供知情同意能力的担忧可能是不必要的,尤其是在症状较少的患者中。

相似文献

1
Capacity of forensic patients to consent to research: the use of the MacCAT-CR.法医鉴定患者同意参与研究的能力:MacCAT-CR的应用。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):299-307.
2
Commentary: on research and forensic patients' capacity.评论:关于研究与法医鉴定患者的行为能力
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):308-9.
3
Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners.涉及囚犯的研究中的强制与知情同意
Compr Psychiatry. 2004 Jan-Feb;45(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2003.09.009.
4
Extra information about treatment is too much for the patient with psychosis.对于精神病患者来说,过多的治疗信息是不利的。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
5
A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.一种用于评估临床研究决策能力的新型简易工具。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;64(8):966-74. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966.
6
Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument.对患有精神分裂症、阿尔茨海默病或糖尿病的老年人参与研究的同意能力评估:一项三项问卷与综合标准化能力评估工具的比较
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;62(7):726-33. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.726.
7
The capacity to consent to treatment and research: a review of standardized assessment tools.同意治疗和研究的能力:标准化评估工具综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):954-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.010.
8
How is informed consent related to emotions and empathy? An exploratory neuroethical investigation.知情同意与情感和同理心有何关系?一项探索性神经伦理学研究。
J Med Ethics. 2011 May;37(5):311-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037937. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
9
A clinical study of competency in psychiatric inpatients.精神病住院患者能力的临床研究。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1996;24(4):505-11.
10
Competence to consent to sexual activity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenic spectrum disorders.双相情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系障碍患者同意性行为的能力。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Apr;41(2):507-15. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9840-3. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.在法医心理健康环境中对女性进行混合方法研究:护士作为研究者的反思性叙述。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70038. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70038.
2
Banking the Future: Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Biobank Research.为未来储备:青少年对生物样本库研究的同意能力。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Jul;41(4):15-22. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500023.
3
[Failure of a study in forensic psychiatric hospitals : Clinical trial to investigate the additive effect of triptorelin on the efficacy of psychotherapy].
[法医精神病医院一项研究的失败:调查曲普瑞林对心理治疗疗效的附加作用的临床试验]
Nervenarzt. 2017 May;88(5):480-485. doi: 10.1007/s00115-017-0301-7.
4
Prevalence and correlates of adequate performance on a measure of abilities related to decisional capacity: differences among three standards for the MacCAT-CR in patients with schizophrenia.在一项与决策能力相关的能力测量中,充分表现的患病率及其相关因素:精神分裂症患者中MacCAT - CR三种标准的差异
Schizophr Res. 2007 Jan;89(1-3):110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Oct 3.