Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估临床研究决策能力的新型简易工具。

A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.

作者信息

Jeste Dilip V, Palmer Barton W, Appelbaum Paul S, Golshan Shahrokh, Glorioso Danielle, Dunn Laura B, Kim Kathleen, Meeks Thomas, Kraemer Helena C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Bldg 13, Fourth Floor, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;64(8):966-74. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966.

Abstract

CONTEXT

There is a critical need for practical measures for screening and documenting decisional capacity in people participating in different types of clinical research. However, there are few reliable and validated brief tools that could be used routinely to evaluate individuals' capacity to consent to a research protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development, testing, and proposed use of a new practical instrument to assess decision-making capacity: the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC). The UBACC is intended to help investigators identify research participants who warrant more thorough decisional capacity assessment and/or remediation efforts prior to enrollment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We developed the UBACC as a 10-item scale that included questions focusing on understanding and appreciation of the information concerning a research protocol. It was developed and tested among middle-aged and older outpatients with schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects participating in research on informed consent. In an investigation of reliability and validity, we studied 127 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 30 healthy comparison subjects who received information about a simulated clinical drug trial. Internal consistency, interrater reliability, and concurrent (criterion) validity (including correlations with an established instrument as well as sensitivity and specificity relative to 2 potential "gold standard" criteria) were measured.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reliability and validity of the UBACC.

RESULTS

The UBACC was found to have good internal consistency, interrater reliability, concurrent validity, high sensitivity, and acceptable specificity. It typically took less than 5 minutes to administer, was easy to use and reliably score, and could be used to identify subjects with questionable capacity to consent to the specific research project.

CONCLUSION

The UBACC is a potentially useful instrument for screening large numbers of subjects to identify those needing more comprehensive decisional capacity assessment and/or remediation efforts.

摘要

背景

对于参与不同类型临床研究的人员,迫切需要实用的方法来筛查和记录其决策能力。然而,几乎没有可靠且经过验证的简短工具可用于常规评估个人同意研究方案的能力。

目的

描述一种用于评估决策能力的新型实用工具——加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校同意能力简要评估量表(UBACC)的开发、测试及拟用情况。UBACC旨在帮助研究人员在招募前识别那些需要更全面决策能力评估和/或补救措施的研究参与者。

设计、地点和参与者:我们将UBACC开发为一个包含10个条目的量表,其中的问题聚焦于对研究方案相关信息的理解和领会。该量表在患有精神分裂症的中老年门诊患者以及参与知情同意研究的健康对照受试者中进行了开发和测试。在一项关于信效度的调查中,我们研究了127例患有精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍的门诊患者以及30名健康对照受试者,这些受试者收到了关于一项模拟临床药物试验的信息。测量了内部一致性、评分者间信度和同时效度(包括与一种既定工具的相关性以及相对于两个潜在“金标准”标准的敏感性和特异性)。

主要结局指标

UBACC的信效度。

结果

发现UBACC具有良好的内部一致性、评分者间信度、同时效度、高敏感性和可接受的特异性。实施该量表通常耗时不到5分钟,易于使用且评分可靠,可用于识别同意参与特定研究项目能力存疑的受试者。

结论

UBACC是一种潜在有用的工具,可用于筛查大量受试者,以识别那些需要更全面决策能力评估和/或补救措施的人。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验