Lochman J E
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Jun;60(3):426-32. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.60.3.426.
This study examined the longer term preventive effects of a school-based intervention with boys referred by classroom teachers as highly aggressive and disruptive. Three years after intervention, boys who had received an anger coping (AC) program were compared with a group of untreated boys. The AC boys had lower rates of drug and alcohol involvement and had higher levels of self-esteem and social problem-solving skills. The AC boys were not significantly different from previously nonaggressive boys on these variables at follow-up. Although the overall intervention did not have longer term effects on delinquency rates or classroom behavior, a subset of boys who also received booster sessions did display maintenance of certain classroom behavior improvement. Implications for intensification of cognitive-behavioral interventions are discussed.
本研究考察了一项针对被课堂教师认定为极具攻击性和扰乱性的男孩的校内干预措施的长期预防效果。干预三年后,将接受过愤怒应对(AC)项目的男孩与一组未接受治疗的男孩进行了比较。参与AC项目的男孩涉及毒品和酒精的比率较低,自尊水平和社会问题解决能力较高。在随访中,参与AC项目的男孩在这些变量上与之前无攻击性的男孩没有显著差异。尽管总体干预措施对犯罪率或课堂行为没有长期影响,但一部分还接受了强化训练的男孩确实保持了课堂行为的某些改善。本文讨论了强化认知行为干预的意义。