Kellam S G, Ling X, Merisca R, Brown C H, Ialongo N
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 1998 Spring;10(2):165-85. doi: 10.1017/s0954579498001564.
This paper is on the influences of the classroom context on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior from entrance into first grade through the transition into middle school. Nineteen public elementary schools participated in developmental epidemiologically based preventive trials in first and second grades, one of which was directed at reducing aggressive, disruptive behavior. At the start of first grade, schools and teachers were randomly assigned to intervention or control conditions. Children within each school were assigned sequentially to classrooms from alphabetized lists, followed by checking to insure balanced assignment based on kindergarten behavior. Despite these procedures, by the end of first quarter, classrooms within schools differed markedly in levels of aggressive behavior. Children were followed through sixth grade, where their aggressive behavior was rated by middle school teachers. Strong interactive effects were found on the risk of being highly aggressive in middle school between the level of aggressive behavior in the first grade classrooms and each boy's own level of aggressive, disruptive behavior in first grade. The more aggressive first grade boys who were in higher aggressive first grade classrooms were at markedly increased risk, compared both to the median first grade boys, and compared to aggressive males in lower aggressive first grade classrooms. Boys were already behaving more aggressively than girls in first grade; and no similar classroom aggression effect was found among girls, although girls' own aggressive behavior did place them at increased risk. The preventive intervention effect, already reported elsewhere to reduce aggressive behavior among the more aggressive males, appeared to do so by reducing high levels of classroom aggression. First grade males' own poverty level was associated with higher risk of being more aggressive, disruptive in first grade, and thereby increased their vulnerability to classroom level of aggression. Both boys and girls in schools in poor communities were at increased risk of being highly aggressive in middle school regardless of their levels of aggressive behavior in first grade. These results are discussed in terms of life course/social field theory as applied to the role of contextual influences on the development and etiology of severe aggressive behavior.
本文探讨了课堂环境对从小学一年级入学到初中过渡阶段攻击行为的过程及可塑性的影响。19所公立小学参与了基于发展流行病学的一、二年级预防性试验,其中一项试验旨在减少攻击性行为和破坏性行为。在一年级开始时,学校和教师被随机分配到干预组或对照组。每个学校的儿童按照字母顺序被依次分配到各个班级,随后根据幼儿园时期的行为表现进行检查以确保分配均衡。尽管采取了这些措施,但在第一季度末,学校内各班级的攻击性行为水平仍存在显著差异。这些儿童一直被跟踪到六年级,由初中教师对他们的攻击性行为进行评分。研究发现,一年级班级中的攻击性行为水平与每个男孩自身一年级时的攻击性行为和破坏性行为水平之间,对初中时出现高度攻击性行为的风险存在强烈的交互作用。与一年级的中等水平男孩相比,以及与一年级低攻击性行为班级中的攻击性男孩相比,处于高攻击性行为一年级班级中的攻击性较强的一年级男孩面临的风险显著增加。在一年级时,男孩的攻击性行为就比女孩更为明显;在女孩中未发现类似的课堂攻击效应,尽管女孩自身的攻击性行为确实使她们面临更高的风险。此前在其他地方报道的预防性干预效果,似乎是通过降低课堂上的高攻击性行为水平来减少攻击性较强男性的攻击行为。一年级男性自身的贫困水平与一年级时更具攻击性和破坏性行为的较高风险相关,从而增加了他们受课堂攻击水平影响的易感性。贫困社区学校中的男孩和女孩,无论他们一年级时的攻击性行为水平如何,在初中时出现高度攻击性行为的风险都更高。本文根据生命历程/社会领域理论对这些结果进行了讨论,该理论适用于情境影响对严重攻击行为的发展和病因的作用。