Suppr超能文献

“脆弱性”作为对人类研究参与者的一种保护措施的局限性。

The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.

作者信息

Levine Carol, Faden Ruth, Grady Christine, Hammerschmidt Dale, Eckenwiler Lisa, Sugarman Jeremy

机构信息

United Hospital Fund.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):44-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160490497083.

Abstract

Vulnerability is one of the least examined concepts in research ethics. Vulnerability was linked in the Belmont Report to questions of justice in the selection of subjects. Regulations and policy documents regarding the ethical conduct of research have focused on vulnerability in terms of limitations of the capacity to provide informed consent. Other interpretations of vulnerability have emphasized unequal power relationships between politically and economically disadvantaged groups and investigators or sponsors. So many groups are now considered to be vulnerable in the context of research, particularly international research, that the concept has lost force. In addition, classifying groups as vulnerable not only stereotypes them, but also may not reliably protect many individuals from harm. Certain individuals require ongoing protections of the kind already established in law and regulation, but attention must also be focused on characteristics of the research protocol and environment that present ethical challenges.

摘要

脆弱性是研究伦理中最少受到审视的概念之一。在《贝尔蒙报告》中,脆弱性与研究对象选择中的公正性问题相关联。有关研究伦理行为的法规和政策文件一直从提供知情同意能力的局限性角度关注脆弱性。对脆弱性的其他解释强调了政治和经济弱势群体与研究者或资助者之间不平等的权力关系。如今,在研究背景下,尤其是国际研究中,有如此多的群体被视为脆弱群体,以至于这个概念已经失去了效力。此外,将群体归类为脆弱群体不仅会使其模式化,而且可能无法可靠地保护许多个体免受伤害。某些个体需要持续受到法律法规中已确立的那种保护,但也必须关注提出伦理挑战的研究方案和环境的特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验