• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Digital mobile telephones and interference of ophthalmic equipment.

作者信息

Ang G S, Lian P, Ng W S, Whyte I, Ong J M

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2007 Jan;21(1):29-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702110. Epub 2005 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1038/sj.eye.6702110
PMID:16200056
Abstract

AIM

To assess the effect of mobile telephone electromagnetic interference on electronic ophthalmic equipment.

METHODS

Prospective audit with mobile telephones placed at distances of 3 m, 1 m, and 30 cm from, and in contact with, electronic ophthalmic equipment. Any interruption or cessation of the function of the ophthalmic device was assessed with the mobile telephones in standby, and in dialling or receiving modes. Any alterations of displayed digital figures or numbers were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 23 electronic ophthalmic devices in two hospital ophthalmology outpatient departments were evaluated. All six mobile telephones used, and 22 (95.7%) of the 23 ophthalmic equipment evaluated had the Conformité Européene (CE) mark. No device showed any interruption or cessation of function. There were no alterations of displayed digital figures or numbers. The only effect of any kind was found with four instruments (1 non-CE marked), where there was temporary flickering on the screen, and only occurred when the mobile telephones were dialling or receiving at a distance of 30 cm or less from the instruments.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that among the electronic ophthalmic devices tested, none suffered failure or interruption of function, from mobile telephone interference. Although not comprehensive for all ophthalmic equipment, the results question the need for a complete ban of mobile telephones in ophthalmic departments. It highlights the need for a controlled, objectively measured study of the clinically relevant effects of mobile telephones in the ophthalmology outpatient setting.

摘要

相似文献

1
Digital mobile telephones and interference of ophthalmic equipment.
Eye (Lond). 2007 Jan;21(1):29-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702110. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
2
[Cellular phone interference with medical instruments].[手机对医疗器械的干扰]
Harefuah. 1997 Mar 2;132(5):313-8, 382.
3
Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment.新一代移动电话对重症监护医疗设备的干扰。
Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc6115.
4
Cellular telephone interference with medical equipment.移动电话对医疗设备的干扰。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Oct;80(10):1286-90. doi: 10.4065/80.10.1286.
5
Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones.移动电话对心脏起搏器的干扰。
N Engl J Med. 1997 May 22;336(21):1473-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705223362101.
6
Mobile communication devices causing interference in invasive and noninvasive ventilators.移动通讯设备对有创和无创呼吸机造成干扰。
J Crit Care. 2007 Jun;22(2):137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.09.006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
7
[Do mobile telephones have adverse effects on the functions of implantable cardioverter defibrillators?].移动电话对植入式心脏复律除颤器的功能有不良影响吗?
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2002 Mar;2(1):45-8, AXVII.
8
Interference of electrocardiographic recordings by a mobile telephone.
Cardiol Young. 2007 Jun;17(3):328-9. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107000443. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
9
Clinical testing of cellular phone ringing interference with automated external defibrillators.手机铃声对自动体外除颤器干扰的临床测试。
Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.013. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
10
In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者体内数字蜂窝电话测试
Eur Heart J. 2001 Aug;22(15):1337-42. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2516.