• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胱抑素C检测在预测肾小球滤过率方面的效能。它是肾衰竭更可靠的标志物吗?

The efficacy of cystatin C assay in the prediction of glomerular filtration rate. Is it a more reliable marker for renal failure?

作者信息

Bicik Zerrin, Bahcebasi Talat, Kulaksizoglu Sevsen, Yavuz Ozlem

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Duzce School of Medicine, Düzce, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(8):855-61. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.144.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2005.144
PMID:16201897
Abstract

We determined the sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics and correlation between cystatin C (cysC) and two widely used markers of renal function, creatinine clearance and serum creatinine, in 244 patients (84 diabetics, 84 hypertensive and 76 healthy subjects). Renal failure was defined as creatinine clearance of less than either 80 or 60 mL/min. Variables were evaluated for two definitions of renal failure and compared between patient groups. Correlation coefficients with cysC were -0.87 for creatinine clearance and 0.92 for creatinine in patients with hypertension; -0.90 for creatinine clearance and 0.97 for creatinine in diabetics; and -0.61 for creatinine clearance and 0.94 for creatinine in the control group. The receiver operating characteristic curves with a cut-off value of 60 mL/min were similar for creatinine and cysC, while at 80 mL/min they were 0.626 for creatinine and 0.813 for cysC levels. We classified the patients into three groups with respect to creatinine clearance (1, >80 mL/min; 2, 60-80 mL/min; 3, <60 mL/min). Mean creatinine (p<0.0001) and cysC (p<0.0001) levels were significantly different between all the groups. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were higher for cysC levels, particularly in diabetics and hypertensive patients. The current study suggests that cysC is preferable for detecting temporal changes in renal function in the early stages of renal insufficiency.

摘要

我们测定了244例患者(84例糖尿病患者、84例高血压患者和76例健康受试者)中胱抑素C(cysC)与两种广泛应用的肾功能标志物——肌酐清除率和血清肌酐之间的敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征及相关性。肾衰竭定义为肌酐清除率低于80或60 mL/分钟。针对两种肾衰竭定义对各项变量进行评估,并在不同患者组之间进行比较。高血压患者中,肌酐清除率与cysC的相关系数为 -0.87,肌酐与cysC的相关系数为0.92;糖尿病患者中,肌酐清除率与cysC的相关系数为 -0.90,肌酐与cysC的相关系数为0.97;对照组中,肌酐清除率与cysC的相关系数为 -0.61,肌酐与cysC的相关系数为0.94。肌酐和cysC以60 mL/分钟为临界值的受试者工作特征曲线相似,而以80 mL/分钟为临界值时,肌酐的曲线下面积为0.626,cysC水平的曲线下面积为0.813。我们根据肌酐清除率将患者分为三组(1组,>80 mL/分钟;2组,60 - 80 mL/分钟;3组,<60 mL/分钟)。所有组之间的平均肌酐水平(p<0.000)和cysC水平(p<0.0001)存在显著差异。cysC水平的敏感性、特异性和预测值更高,尤其是在糖尿病患者和高血压患者中。当前研究表明,cysC更适合用于检测肾功能不全早期阶段的肾功能动态变化。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of cystatin C assay in the prediction of glomerular filtration rate. Is it a more reliable marker for renal failure?胱抑素C检测在预测肾小球滤过率方面的效能。它是肾衰竭更可靠的标志物吗?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(8):855-61. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.144.
2
Cystatin C is not more sensitive than creatinine for detecting early renal impairment in patients with diabetes.在检测糖尿病患者早期肾功能损害方面,胱抑素C并不比肌酐更敏感。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Aug;38(2):310-6. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.26096.
3
[Cystatin C as estimator of glomerular filtration rate in patients with advanced chronic renal disease].[胱抑素C作为晚期慢性肾病患者肾小球滤过率的评估指标]
Nefrologia. 2006;26(4):433-8.
4
Improved estimation of GFR by serum cystatin C in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.通过血清胱抑素C改善对接受心导管插入术患者的肾小球滤过率估计。
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 10;102(2):173-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.04.009.
5
The comparison of cystatin C and creatinine as an accurate serum marker in the prediction of type 2 diabetic nephropathy.胱抑素C与肌酐作为预测2型糖尿病肾病的准确血清标志物的比较。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;78(3):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.06.015. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
6
Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease.血清胱抑素C作为慢性肾脏病患者肾功能的内源性标志物。
Ren Fail. 2008;30(2):181-6. doi: 10.1080/08860220701810315.
7
Cystatin C could be a replacement to serum creatinine for diagnosing and monitoring kidney function in children.胱抑素C可替代血清肌酐用于儿童肾功能的诊断和监测。
Clin Biochem. 2008 May;41(7-8):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
Comparison of cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict coronary heart disease risk in Japanese patients with obesity and diabetes.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率用于预测日本肥胖和糖尿病患者冠心病风险的比较
Endocr J. 2015;62(2):201-7. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0352. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
Glomerular filtration rate estimation in patients with advanced chronic renal insufficiency based on serum cystatin C levels.基于血清胱抑素C水平评估晚期慢性肾功能不全患者的肾小球滤过率
Nephron Clin Pract. 2003;93(4):c146-51. doi: 10.1159/000070234.
10
Interest of cystatin C in screening diabetic patients for early impairment of renal function.胱抑素C在筛查糖尿病患者肾功能早期损害中的应用价值。
Metabolism. 2003 Oct;52(10):1258-64. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00193-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of serum cystatin C for diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis.血清胱抑素 C 对糖尿病肾病的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01052-0.
2
Serum Cystatin C Trajectory Is a Marker Associated With Diabetic Kidney Disease.血清胱抑素 C 轨迹与糖尿病肾病相关。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 11;13:824279. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.824279. eCollection 2022.
3
Biomarkers of delayed graft function as a form of acute kidney injury in kidney transplantation.
移植肾延迟复功作为肾移植中急性肾损伤一种形式的生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 15;5:11684. doi: 10.1038/srep11684.
4
Evaluation of the serum cystatin C values in prediction of indications for hemodialysis in patients with chronic renal failure.评价慢性肾衰竭患者血清胱抑素 C 值对血液透析适应证的预测价值。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Jan;46(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0481-4. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
5
Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased urinary albumin excretion.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与尿白蛋白排泄增加有关。
Sleep. 2007 Jul;30(7):923-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.7.923.