Mollet Nico R, Cademartiri Filippo, van Mieghem Carlos A G, Runza Giuseppe, McFadden Eugène P, Baks Timo, Serruys Patrick W, Krestin Gabriel P, de Feyter Pim J
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Circulation. 2005 Oct 11;112(15):2318-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
The diagnostic performance of the latest 64-slice CT scanner, with increased temporal (165 ms) and spatial (0.4 mm3) resolution, to detect significant stenoses in the clinically relevant coronary tree is unknown.
We studied 52 patients (34 men; mean age, 59.6+/-12.1 years) with atypical chest pain, stable or unstable angina pectoris, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. All patients had stable sinus rhythm. Patients with initial heart rates > or =70 bpm received beta-blockers. Mean scan time was 13.3+/-0.9 seconds. The CT scans were analyzed by 2 observers unaware of the results of invasive coronary angiography, which was used as the standard of reference. All available coronary segments, regardless of size, were included in the evaluation. Lesions with > or =50 luminal narrowing were considered significant stenoses. Invasive coronary angiography demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 25% (13 of 52), single-vessel disease in 31% (16 of 52), and multivessel disease in 45% (23 of 52) of patients. One unsuccessful CT scan was classified as inconclusive. Ninety-four significant stenoses were present in the remaining 51 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CT for detecting significant stenoses on a segment-by-segment analysis were 99% (93 of 94; 95% CI, 94 to 99), 95% (601 of 631; 95% CI, 93 to 96), 76% (93 of 123; 95% CI, 67 to 89), and 99% (601 of 602; 95% CI, 99 to 100), respectively.
Noninvasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography accurately detects coronary stenoses in patients in sinus rhythm and presenting with atypical chest pain, stable or unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
最新的64层CT扫描仪具有更高的时间分辨率(165毫秒)和空间分辨率(0.4立方毫米),其检测临床相关冠状动脉树中显著狭窄的诊断性能尚不清楚。
我们研究了52例患者(34例男性;平均年龄59.6±12.1岁),这些患者有非典型胸痛、稳定或不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死,计划进行诊断性常规冠状动脉造影。所有患者均为窦性心律。初始心率≥70次/分的患者接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。平均扫描时间为13.3±0.9秒。CT扫描由2名不知道有创冠状动脉造影结果的观察者进行分析,有创冠状动脉造影结果用作参考标准。所有可用的冠状动脉节段,无论大小,均纳入评估。管腔狭窄≥50%的病变被视为显著狭窄。有创冠状动脉造影显示,25%(52例中的13例)患者无显著病变,31%(52例中的16例)患者为单支血管病变,45%(52例中的23例)患者为多支血管病变。1次CT扫描未成功被归类为不确定。其余51例患者中存在94处显著狭窄。在逐段分析中,CT检测显著狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为99%(94处中的93处;95%可信区间,94%至99%)、95%(631处中的601处;95%可信区间,93%至96%)、76%(123处中的93处;95%可信区间,67%至89%)和99%(602处中的601处;95%可信区间,99%至100%)。
无创64层CT冠状动脉造影能准确检测窦性心律且有非典型胸痛、稳定或不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的患者的冠状动脉狭窄。