Suppr超能文献

退行性脊柱疾病手术决策的差异。第一部分:腰椎

Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine.

作者信息

Irwin Zareth N, Hilibrand Alan, Gustavel Michael, McLain Robert, Shaffer William, Myers Mark, Glaser John, Hart Robert A

机构信息

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2208-13. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181057.60012.08.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Survey-based descriptive study.

OBJECTIVE

To study relationships between surgeon-specific factors and surgical approach to degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Geographic variations in the rates of lumbar spine surgery are significant within the United States. Although surgeon density correlates with the rates of spine surgery, other reasons for variation such as surgeon age and training background are poorly understood.

METHODS

A total of 22 orthopedic surgeons and 8 neurosurgeons of varied ages and geographic regions answered questions regarding the need for surgery, surgical approach, and use of fusion and instrumentation for 5 simulated cases. Cases included: (1) multilevel stenosis without deformity or instability, (2) degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis, (3) isthmic (spondylolytic) spondylolisthesis with foraminal stenosis, (4) degenerative scoliosis with stenosis, and (5) recurrent stenosis following prior laminectomy without deformity or instability. The effects of surgeon age and training background on surgical decision making were analyzed using an independent samples t test and Fisher exact test, respectively.

RESULTS

Significant variation in treatment approach among surgeons was noted for all cases except the patient with lytic spondylolisthesis, for whom all surgeons recommended fusion. Orthopedists recommended fusion and instrumentation more often than neurosurgeons for all cases, reaching significance for degenerative scoliosis with stenosis (P = 0.02 for both fusion and instrumentation). Younger surgeons were generally more likely to recommend instrumentation than their older peers, reaching significance for multilevel stenosis without deformity or instability and recurrent stenosis following prior laminectomy without deformity or instability (P = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Variations in surgical approach to lumbar degenerative diseases may depend on a patient's clinical condition. This study found strong agreement in the approach to lytic spondylolisthesis but significant variation for other degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. In addition, recommendation for fusion and instrumentation varied with surgeon age and training background. Previously documented geographic variations may result in part from a lack of consensus on appropriate treatment techniques for specific lumbar degenerative conditions, as well as surgeon-specific factors.

摘要

研究设计

基于调查的描述性研究。

目的

研究外科医生特定因素与腰椎退行性疾病手术方式之间的关系。

背景数据总结

在美国,腰椎手术率存在显著的地区差异。尽管外科医生密度与脊柱手术率相关,但对于诸如外科医生年龄和培训背景等其他差异原因,人们了解甚少。

方法

共有22名不同年龄和地区的骨科医生以及8名神经外科医生,就5个模拟病例回答了有关手术必要性、手术方式以及融合和内固定使用情况的问题。病例包括:(1)无畸形或不稳定的多节段狭窄;(2)伴有狭窄的退行性椎体滑脱;(3)伴有椎间孔狭窄的峡部(椎弓根崩裂性)椎体滑脱;(4)伴有狭窄的退行性脊柱侧凸;(5)既往椎板切除术后无畸形或不稳定的复发性狭窄。分别使用独立样本t检验和Fisher精确检验分析外科医生年龄和培训背景对手术决策的影响。

结果

除椎弓根崩裂性椎体滑脱患者外,所有病例外科医生的治疗方式均存在显著差异,对于该病例所有外科医生均建议进行融合手术。在所有病例中,骨科医生比神经外科医生更常建议进行融合和内固定,对于伴有狭窄的退行性脊柱侧凸,融合和内固定均具有显著性差异(P = 0.02)。年轻外科医生通常比年长同行更倾向于建议使用内固定,对于无畸形或不稳定的多节段狭窄以及既往椎板切除术后无畸形或不稳定的复发性狭窄具有显著性差异(分别为P = 0.05和0.01)。

结论

腰椎退行性疾病手术方式的差异可能取决于患者的临床状况。本研究发现,对于椎弓根崩裂性椎体滑脱的手术方式意见高度一致,但对于腰椎的其他退行性疾病存在显著差异。此外,融合和内固定的建议因外科医生年龄和培训背景而异。先前记录的地区差异可能部分源于对特定腰椎退行性疾病适当治疗技术缺乏共识,以及外科医生特定因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验