• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在IMMULITE 2000随机存取免疫分析仪上进行过敏测试——一项临床评估研究。

Allergy testing on the IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access immunoanalyzer - a clinical evaluation study.

作者信息

Cobbaert Christa M, Jonker Geert Jan

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amphia Hospital, Location Langendijk, Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(7):772-81. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.132.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2005.132
PMID:16207141
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IMMULITE 2000 Allergy System from Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC) for the detection of inhalant and food allergies, focusing on inhalant and food screens, mixes and single allergens.

METHODS

Serum samples were collected from new, unselected patients who were referred to the allergist for a suspected allergy. Patients were classified as study diagnosis-positive for inhalant (food) allergy if they had both a positive clinical examination/history and a positive skin test for inhalant (food) allergy; otherwise - failing one or both of these criteria - they were classified as study diagnosis-negative. Classification and testing of the serum samples was carried out in a blinded fashion. Values greater than 0.35 kU/L were considered positive.

RESULTS

Of the 118 patients included, 63 were considered study diagnosis-positive for inhalation and/or food allergy. DPC inhalation screening showed 82% total agreement (TA) and 91% sensitivity relative to the study diagnoses. The DPC food panel showed 96% TA and 98% specificity relative to the study diagnoses. Relative to specific intracutaneous testing (ICT), the DPC D1, E1 and E5 assays had sensitivity of 82-90%; tree and grass panels had sensitivity of 74% and 95%. The DPC weed panel and initial lots of DPC E5 had poor sensitivity (<40%); mold panel sensitivity was equally low for both DPC and the routinely used Pharmacia assay (36%). Relative to skin prick testing (SPT), specific food allergens had TA of 94-98% and specificity of 95-100%.

CONCLUSION

In patients classified by the combination of clinical examination/history and skin test results, the DPC IMMULITE 2000 Allergy System generally demonstrated acceptable sensitivity, specificity and TA compared to the study diagnoses, both at the screening level and at the level of panels and single allergens.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估诊断产品公司(DPC)的IMMULITE 2000过敏检测系统对吸入性和食物过敏的诊断性能,重点关注吸入性和食物筛查、混合物及单一过敏原检测。

方法

收集新的、未经挑选的因疑似过敏而转诊至过敏症专科医生处的患者的血清样本。若患者临床检查/病史呈阳性且吸入性(食物)过敏皮肤试验呈阳性,则被分类为吸入性(食物)过敏研究诊断阳性;否则,若未满足其中一项或两项标准,则被分类为研究诊断阴性。血清样本的分类和检测以盲法进行。大于0.35 kU/L的值被视为阳性。

结果

纳入的118例患者中,63例被认为吸入性和/或食物过敏研究诊断阳性。相对于研究诊断,DPC吸入性筛查的总一致性(TA)为82%,敏感性为91%。DPC食物检测组相对于研究诊断的TA为96%,特异性为98%。相对于特定皮内试验(ICT),DPC D1、E1和E5检测的敏感性为82% - 90%;树木和草类检测组的敏感性分别为74%和95%。DPC杂草检测组及DPC E5的初始批次敏感性较差(<40%);霉菌检测组对于DPC和常规使用的法玛西亚检测的敏感性同样较低(36%)。相对于皮肤点刺试验(SPT),特定食物过敏原的TA为94% - 98%,特异性为95% - 100%。

结论

在通过临床检查/病史及皮肤试验结果综合分类的患者中,与研究诊断相比,DPC IMMULITE 2000过敏检测系统在筛查水平以及检测组和单一过敏原水平上,总体表现出可接受的敏感性、特异性和TA。

相似文献

1
Allergy testing on the IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access immunoanalyzer - a clinical evaluation study.在IMMULITE 2000随机存取免疫分析仪上进行过敏测试——一项临床评估研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(7):772-81. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.132.
2
The first fully automated allergy analyser UniCAP: comparison with IMMULITE for allergy panel testing.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997 Nov;35(11):885-8.
3
In vitro diagnostic evaluation of patients with inhalant allergies: summary of probability outcomes comparing results of CLA- and CAP-specific immunoglobulin E test systems.吸入性过敏患者的体外诊断评估:比较CLA和CAP特异性免疫球蛋白E检测系统结果的概率结果总结。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):253-8.
4
Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system.一种用于测量过敏原特异性IgE的新型自动化酶免疫测定法的性能特征。将过敏原皮肤试验结果与使用HYTEC系统和CAP系统获得的结果进行比较的概率结果总结。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jul;79(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63080-3.
5
Comparison of serum-specific IgE (ImmunoCAP) and skin-prick test results for 53 inhalant allergens in patients with chronic rhinitis.比较慢性鼻炎患者 53 种吸入性过敏原的血清特异性 IgE(免疫 CAP)和皮肤点刺试验结果。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):386-96. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3258.
6
The prevalence and diagnostic value of specific IgE antibodies to inhalant, animal and plant food, and ficus allergens in patients with natural rubber latex allergy.天然橡胶乳胶过敏患者中针对吸入性、动物性和植物性食物以及榕属过敏原的特异性IgE抗体的患病率及诊断价值
Acta Clin Belg. 2003 May-Jun;58(3):183-9. doi: 10.1179/acb.2003.58.3.006.
7
Epidemiology of atopy patch tests with food and inhalant allergens in an unselected population of children.未经过筛选的儿童群体中食物和吸入性过敏原特异性斑贴试验的流行病学研究
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008 Nov;19(7):599-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00712.x. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
8
Correlation analysis of two serum-specific immunoglobulin E test systems and skin-prick test in allergic rhinitis patients from northeast China.中国东北地区变应性鼻炎患者两种血清特异性免疫球蛋白 E 检测系统与皮肤点刺试验的相关性分析。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):116-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3572. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
9
Latex specific IgE: performance characteristics of the IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy assay compared with skin testing.乳胶特异性IgE:与皮肤试验相比,IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy检测的性能特征
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Aug;97(2):196-202. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60013-0.
10
Differential diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergy in young children with wheezing or eczema symptoms using a single blood test.使用单一血液检测对有喘息或湿疹症状的幼儿进行IgE介导的过敏的鉴别诊断。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Oct;93(4):328-33. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61390-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Turkish Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis (ART).土耳其变应性鼻炎诊断与治疗指南(ART)
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;59(Suppl 1):1-157. doi: 10.4274/tao.2021.suppl.1.
2
Diagnosing environmental allergies: Comparison of skin-prick, intradermal, and serum specific immunoglobulin E testing.诊断环境过敏:皮肤点刺试验、皮内试验和血清特异性免疫球蛋白E检测的比较
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2017 Jun 1;8(2):53-62. doi: 10.2500/ar.2017.8.0194.
3
Comparison of three multiple allergen simultaneous tests: RIDA allergy screen, MAST optigen, and polycheck allergy.
三种多过敏原同时检测方法的比较:RIDA 过敏原筛查、MAST optigen 和 polycheck 过敏原。
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:340513. doi: 10.1155/2013/340513. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
4
Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy: pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies.食物过敏评估中的常见方法:食物过敏患病率研究的陷阱与前景
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014 Jun;46(3):198-210. doi: 10.1007/s12016-012-8337-8.
5
Agreement of specific IgE and skin prick test in an unselected cohort of two-year-old children.两岁儿童中未选择队列中特异性 IgE 与皮肤点刺试验的一致性。
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;171(3):479-84. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1580-9. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
6
Association of polymorphisms of the CHI3L1 gene with asthma and atopy: a populations-based study of 6514 Danish adults.CHI3L1基因多态性与哮喘和特应性的关联:一项基于6514名丹麦成年人的人群研究。
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 1;4(7):e6106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006106.