• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国东北地区变应性鼻炎患者两种血清特异性免疫球蛋白 E 检测系统与皮肤点刺试验的相关性分析。

Correlation analysis of two serum-specific immunoglobulin E test systems and skin-prick test in allergic rhinitis patients from northeast China.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):116-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3572. Epub 2011 Jan 28.

DOI:10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3572
PMID:21294972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin-prick testing (SPT) is the most common screening method for allergy evaluation. The detection of serum-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is also commonly used. The sensitivity and specificity of these testing methods may vary due to type of causative allergen and type of allergic manifestation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between two methods of measuring sIgE (AllergyScreen [Mediwiss Analytic GmbH, Moers, Germany] and ImmunoCAP [Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden]) and SPT for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR).

METHODS

All 216 patients who were referred to the allergist for suspected AR from June to October 2009 had SPT and the two serological tests. One hundred fifty-eight patients had a positive clinical history and a related positive SPT. The SPT was used as reference standard, and we selected three allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, mugwort, and ragweed), which were common in fall in northeast China, to analyze the correlation of the two serum tests and SPT.

RESULTS

Compared with the SPT, the diagnostic indexes (accuracy, sensitivity and specificity) of the AllergyScreen system and the ImmunoCAP system were 0.819 versus 0.810, 0.780 versus 0.872, and 0.862 versus 0.741, respectively. The accuracy was similar between the two systems (p > 0.05). The ImmunoCAP system method had a higher sensitivity (p < 0.01). The AllergyScreen system had a higher specificity (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These data support that the AllergyScreen system and ImmunoCAP system can identify potentially significant allergens in the diagnosis of AR in patients from northeastern China.

摘要

背景

皮肤点刺试验(SPT)是评估过敏最常用的筛查方法。血清特异性免疫球蛋白 E(sIgE)检测也常用。由于致病过敏原和过敏表现类型的不同,这些检测方法的敏感性和特异性可能会有所不同。本研究旨在评估两种 sIgE 测量方法(AllergyScreen[Mediwiss Analytic GmbH,Moers,Germany]和 ImmunoCAP[Pharmacia,Uppsala,Sweden])与 SPT 对过敏性鼻炎(AR)诊断的相关性。

方法

2009 年 6 月至 10 月,所有因疑似 AR 而被转介至过敏专家的 216 例患者均进行了 SPT 和两种血清学检测。158 例患者有阳性临床病史和相关阳性 SPT。以 SPT 为参考标准,我们选择了三种在东北地区秋季常见的过敏原(屋尘螨、蒿属和豚草),分析了两种血清检测和 SPT 的相关性。

结果

与 SPT 相比,AllergyScreen 系统和 ImmunoCAP 系统的诊断指标(准确性、敏感性和特异性)分别为 0.819 对 0.810、0.780 对 0.872 和 0.862 对 0.741。两种系统的准确性相似(p>0.05)。ImmunoCAP 系统方法的敏感性更高(p<0.01)。AllergyScreen 系统的特异性更高(p<0.01)。

结论

这些数据支持 AllergyScreen 系统和 ImmunoCAP 系统可用于识别中国东北地区患者 AR 潜在的重要过敏原。

相似文献

1
Correlation analysis of two serum-specific immunoglobulin E test systems and skin-prick test in allergic rhinitis patients from northeast China.中国东北地区变应性鼻炎患者两种血清特异性免疫球蛋白 E 检测系统与皮肤点刺试验的相关性分析。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):116-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3572. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
2
[Correlation analysis of two serum specific IgE test systems and skin prick test in allergic rhinitis patients].变应性鼻炎患者两种血清特异性IgE检测系统与皮肤点刺试验的相关性分析
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Aug;45(8):652-5.
3
[Evaluation of exposure and sensitization to house dust mites among rhinitis patients in the steppe environment of Inner Mongolia].[内蒙古草原环境下鼻炎患者对屋尘螨的暴露与致敏情况评估]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;47(1):19-25.
4
[A cohort investigation of the allergen and pathogenesis in the patients with allergic rhinitis from three hospital of Guangdong Province].[广东省三所医院变应性鼻炎患者变应原及发病机制的队列研究]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;25(23):1064-7.
5
[The correlation of serum specific IgE detection and skin prick test in allergic rhinitis].[血清特异性IgE检测与变应性鼻炎皮肤点刺试验的相关性]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;27(2):75-7, 80.
6
A clinical evaluation in children of the Pharmacia ImmunoCAP system for inhalant allergens.针对儿童的法玛西亚免疫捕获系统吸入性过敏原的临床评估。
Clin Exp Allergy. 1996 Jun;26(6):697-702.
7
[Rapid specific IgE assay (ImmunoCAP® RAPID) and skin prick test in the diagnosis of allergic disease].[快速特异性IgE检测(免疫CAP®快速法)及皮肤点刺试验在过敏性疾病诊断中的应用]
Arerugi. 2013 Dec;62(12):1631-41.
8
Correlation of routine examinations for the diagnosis of house dust mite allergic rhinitis.用于诊断屋尘螨过敏性鼻炎的常规检查的相关性
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(4):182-8. doi: 10.1159/000328344. Epub 2011 May 27.
9
Evaluation of serum specific IgE for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis with multi-allergens.评估血清特异性 IgE 对多过敏原过敏性鼻炎的诊断价值。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Oct;123(20):2836-41.
10
[Comparison of two specific immunoglobulin E test systems in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis].[两种特异性免疫球蛋白E检测系统在变应性鼻炎诊断中的比较]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;23(11):484-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test-Immunoblot Assay for Immunoglobulin E Detection in Patients with Isolated Allergic Conjunctivitis.多重变应原同步检测-免疫印迹法检测单纯性变应性结膜炎患者的免疫球蛋白E
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):960. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050960.
2
Prevalence of allergen sensitization among 1,091 patients with urticaria.1091例荨麻疹患者的变应原致敏率
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Mar;19(3):1908-1914. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8367. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Ragweed-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: current and emerging treatment options.
豚草引起的变应性鼻结膜炎:当前及新出现的治疗选择
J Asthma Allergy. 2015 Feb 16;8:15-24. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S47789. eCollection 2015.
4
Skin testing versus serum-specific IgE testing: which is better for diagnosing aeroallergen sensitization and predicting clinical allergy?皮肤点刺试验与血清特异性 IgE 检测:哪一种方法更适合诊断气传过敏原致敏和预测临床过敏?
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 May;14(5):430. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0430-z.