Suppr超能文献

三种多过敏原同时检测方法的比较:RIDA 过敏原筛查、MAST optigen 和 polycheck 过敏原。

Comparison of three multiple allergen simultaneous tests: RIDA allergy screen, MAST optigen, and polycheck allergy.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:340513. doi: 10.1155/2013/340513. Epub 2012 Dec 24.

Abstract

We compared the performances of 3 Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test (MAST) assays: RIDA Allergy Screen (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany), MAST Optigen allergy system (Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, Mountain View, CA), and Polycheck Allergy (Biocheck GmbH, Munster, Germany). Forty sera that tested positive with the RIDA Allergy Screen (20 for food and 20 for inhalant panel) were subjected to MAST Optigen and Polycheck Allergy. For 26 available sera with discrepant results, 62 ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE tests (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden) were performed. Percent agreements (kappa value) were 87.6% (0.59) and 91.3% (0.60) between RIDA and MAST; 89.9% (0.55) and 88.3% (0.46) between RIDA and Polycheck; and 86.8% (0.51) and 90.6% (0.61) between MAST and Polycheck. Compared with ImmunoCAP, agreements (kappa value) of inhalant and food panels were 51.7% (0.04) and 33.3% (-0.38) for RIDA; 60.7% (0.27) and 81.8% (0.59) for MAST; and 65.5% (0.26) and 45.5% (0.07) for Polycheck. The agreements between RIDA, MAST, and Polycheck and ImmunoCAP-positivity were 45.7%, 88.2%, and 28.6%, respectively, and the agreements for ImmunoCAP-negativity were 37.0%, 51.9%, and 88.9%. MAST Optigen showed better agreement with ImmunoCAP than other assays in the food panel. Better sensitivity of MAST Optigen and better specificity of Polycheck Allergy were suspected.

摘要

我们比较了三种多重过敏原同时检测(MAST)检测试剂盒的性能:RIDA 过敏原筛查(R-Biopharm,达姆施塔特,德国)、MAST Optigen 过敏系统(日立化学诊断,山景城,CA)和 Polycheck 过敏(Biocheck GmbH,明斯特,德国)。将 40 份 RIDA 过敏原筛查阳性的血清(20 份食物和 20 份吸入物)进行 MAST Optigen 和 Polycheck Allergy 检测。对于 26 份存在不一致结果的血清,进行了 62 项 ImmunoCAP 过敏原特异性 IgE 检测(Pharmacia Diagnostics,乌普萨拉,瑞典)。一致性百分比(kappa 值)分别为 RIDA 与 MAST 之间为 87.6%(0.59)和 91.3%(0.60);RIDA 与 Polycheck 之间为 89.9%(0.55)和 88.3%(0.46);MAST 与 Polycheck 之间为 86.8%(0.51)和 90.6%(0.61)。与 ImmunoCAP 相比,吸入物和食物面板的一致性(kappa 值)分别为 RIDA 为 51.7%(0.04)和 33.3%(-0.38);MAST 为 60.7%(0.27)和 81.8%(0.59);Polycheck 为 65.5%(0.26)和 45.5%(0.07)。RIDA、MAST 和 Polycheck 与 ImmunoCAP 阳性的一致性分别为 45.7%、88.2%和 28.6%,而 ImmunoCAP 阴性的一致性分别为 37.0%、51.9%和 88.9%。MAST Optigen 在食物面板中与 ImmunoCAP 的一致性优于其他检测试剂盒。怀疑 MAST Optigen 的敏感性更好,而 Polycheck Allergy 的特异性更好。

相似文献

5
Comparison study between MAST CLA and OPTIGEN.MAST CLA 和 OPTIGEN 的对比研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):e156-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3646.

引用本文的文献

4
Retrospective Analysis of Allergen Distribution Dynamics in Central Taiwan.台湾中部过敏原分布动态的回顾性分析。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2023 Nov 14;80:12030. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2023.12030. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Comparison study between MAST CLA and OPTIGEN.MAST CLA 和 OPTIGEN 的对比研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):e156-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3646.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验