Mahajan Vikram K, Sharma Nand Lal, Sharma Ramesh Chander, Garg Geeta
Department of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India.
Int J Dermatol. 2005 Oct;44(10):821-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02218.x.
Pemphigus, a common immunobullous disease of skin and mucous membranes affecting both sexes of all ages, was almost fatal before the advent of corticosteroids. Better strategies to avoid their side-effects and recent introduction of adjuvant therapy has further improved its prognosis. As the treatment remains need-based and patient-specific, different regimens and strategies have evolved, each with its own merits and demerits. This retrospective hospital-based study was carried out to understand the clinico-therapeutic aspects of pemphigus in our clinic.
Medical records of all new patients admitted to our hospital with the diagnosis of pemphigus from 1990 to 2002 were analyzed. The diagnosis was mainly clinical and confirmed by positive Tzanck's test and histopathology. All patients were assessed clinically on a severity score of 1+ to 4+. These patients had received treatment with dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) therapy, oral mini-pulse (OMP) with betamethasone, or intramuscular triamcinolone acetonide alone or with azathioprine, dapsone or cyclophosphamide. They were followed up for clinical remission and side-effects of therapy.
There were a total of 54 new patients comprising 53.7% females and 46.3% males, and 12.9% of these were < 18 years of age. Pemphigus vulgaris was the commonest clinical type seen in 81.48% and mucosal involvement was seen in 63.63% of cases. The severity of mucosal lesions was not proportionate to that of cutaneous lesions. Associated diseases seen were seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperthyroidism in one case each. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy was given to 75% of the pemphigus vulgaris patients while those having less severe disease were treated with other regimens. In general, clinical remission was seen after 2-16 (mean 6.5) DCP doses. Two patients have been in complete remission for the last 5 and 7 years of completion of DCP therapy, respectively. Addition of other adjuvants to corticosteroids was also helpful. However, azathioprine 50 mg/day was not as effective as cyclophosphamide 50 mg/day. Menstrual irregularities, amenorrhoea, azoospermia, rise in blood pressure and glycosuria were the major side-effects seen during DCP pulse therapy. Drop out rate was unacceptably high with all modes of treatment, although with DCP therapy it appears to be partly owing to early disease control. There was no mortality in this series.
Pemphigus vulgaris is the commonest clinical type. Mucosal surfaces other than the oral cavity are uncommonly involved, it may herald the onset of disease and takes longer to heal. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy seems to have a definite advantage over treatment with steroids alone, especially in terms of better control of disease activity, near absence of steroid side-effects and significantly reduced hospital stay. However, ways and means to reduce gonadal toxicity of adjuvants need to be explored as DCP therapy is likely to stay as a treatment of choice.
天疱疮是一种常见的皮肤和黏膜免疫性大疱性疾病,可累及各年龄段的男女,在皮质类固醇出现之前几乎是致命的。避免其副作用的更好策略以及近期辅助治疗的引入进一步改善了其预后。由于治疗仍然是基于需求且针对患者个体的,不同的治疗方案和策略不断发展,每种都有其优缺点。本项基于医院的回顾性研究旨在了解我院天疱疮的临床治疗情况。
分析1990年至2002年我院收治的所有诊断为天疱疮的新患者的病历。诊断主要依据临床症状,并通过阳性的棘层松解试验和组织病理学检查确诊。所有患者均根据1+至4+的严重程度评分进行临床评估。这些患者接受了地塞米松-环磷酰胺冲击(DCP)疗法、倍他米松口服小剂量冲击(OMP)疗法,或单独使用曲安奈德肌肉注射,或联合硫唑嘌呤、氨苯砜或环磷酰胺治疗。对他们进行随访,观察临床缓解情况及治疗的副作用。
共有54例新患者,其中女性占53.7%,男性占46.3%,12.9%的患者年龄小于18岁。寻常型天疱疮是最常见的临床类型,占81.48%,63.63%的病例有黏膜受累。黏膜病变的严重程度与皮肤病变不成比例。相关疾病包括血清学阳性的类风湿关节炎、高血压、糖尿病和甲状腺功能亢进症,各有1例。75%的寻常型天疱疮患者接受了地塞米松-环磷酰胺冲击疗法,病情较轻的患者采用其他治疗方案。一般来说,在给予2 - 16(平均6.5)次DCP剂量后可见临床缓解。两名患者在完成DCP治疗后的最后5年和7年分别完全缓解。在皮质类固醇基础上加用其他辅助药物也有帮助。然而,硫唑嘌呤50mg/天的效果不如环磷酰胺50mg/天。月经不调、闭经、无精子症、血压升高和糖尿是DCP冲击治疗期间出现的主要副作用。尽管所有治疗方式的脱落率都高得令人难以接受,但DCP治疗的脱落率部分似乎是由于疾病得到早期控制。本系列病例无死亡病例。
寻常型天疱疮是最常见的临床类型。除口腔外的其他黏膜表面较少受累,可能预示疾病的发作且愈合时间较长。地塞米松-环磷酰胺冲击疗法似乎比单独使用类固醇治疗有明显优势,特别是在更好地控制疾病活动、几乎没有类固醇副作用以及显著缩短住院时间方面。然而,由于DCP疗法可能仍是首选治疗方法,需要探索减少辅助药物性腺毒性的方法。