Morgan O
Kensington and Chelsea Primary Care Trust, London, UK.
Public Health. 2005 May;119(5):361-70. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.008.
To review current evidence of effectiveness for exercise-referral schemes.
Studies were identified from MEDLINE 1966-2002, EMBASE 1980-2002 and CINHAL 1982-2002 and bibliographies of relevant papers.
Interventions providing access to exercise activities and/or facilities, experimental or quasi-experimental studies, studies with a control group, interventions based in a primary care setting, and interventions including an exercise component with measures of physical activity levels.
Exercise-referral schemes appear to increase physical activity levels in certain populations, namely individuals who are not sedentary but already slightly active, older adults and those who are overweight (but not obese). However, increases in the level of physical activity may not be sustained over time. Further studies are required to assess effectiveness in a range of populations and for different activities, and to find strategies to increase long-term adherence.
回顾当前运动转诊计划有效性的证据。
从1966 - 2002年的MEDLINE、1980 - 2002年的EMBASE和1982 - 2002年的CINHAL以及相关论文的参考文献中检索研究。
提供运动活动和/或设施的干预措施、实验性或准实验性研究、有对照组的研究、基于初级保健环境的干预措施，以及包括运动成分并伴有身体活动水平测量的干预措施。
运动转诊计划似乎能提高某些人群的身体活动水平，即那些并非久坐不动而是已有一定活动量的个体、老年人以及超重（但非肥胖）者。然而，身体活动水平的提高可能无法长期持续。需要进一步研究以评估在一系列人群中针对不同活动的有效性，并找到提高长期依从性的策略。
